Wegierak, D. et al. Nanobubble distinction enhanced ultrasound imaging: a evaluate. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 16, e2007 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferrara, Okay. W., Borden, M. A. & Zhang, H. Lipid-shelled autos: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug supply. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 881–892 (2009).
Google Scholar
Krupka, T. M. et al. Formulation and characterization of echogenic lipid−pluronic nanobubbles. Mol. Pharm. 7, 49–59 (2010).
Google Scholar
Paefgen, V., Doleschel, D. & Kiessling, F. Evolution of distinction brokers for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug supply. Entrance. Pharmacol. 6, 197 (2015).
Google Scholar
Feinstein, S. B. et al. Security and efficacy of a brand new transpulmonary ultrasound distinction agent: preliminary multicenter scientific outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 16, 316–324 (1990).
Google Scholar
Exner, A. A. & Kolios, M. C. Bursting microbubbles: how nanobubble distinction brokers can allow the way forward for medical ultrasound molecular imaging and image-guided remedy. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 54, 101463 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wu, H. et al. Time-intensity-curve evaluation and tumor extravasation of nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 2502–2514 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pellow, C., O’Reilly, M. A., Hynynen, Okay., Zheng, G. & Goertz, D. E. Simultaneous intravital optical and acoustic monitoring of ultrasound-triggered nanobubble technology and extravasation. Nano Lett. 20, 4512–4519 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ramirez, D. G. et al. Distinction-enhanced ultrasound with sub-micron sized distinction brokers detects insulitis in mouse fashions of type1 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 11 (2020).
de Leon, A. et al. Distinction enhanced ultrasound imaging by nature-inspired ultrastable echogenic nanobubbles. Nanoscale 11, 15647–15658 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cooley, M. B. et al. Characterization of the interplay of nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers with human blood parts. Bioact. Mater. 19, 642–652 (2023).
Chen, C. et al. Pharmacokinetic modeling of the second-wave phenomenon in nanobubble-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3184266 (2022).
Chen, C. et al. Pharmacokinetic modeling of PSMA-targeted nanobubbles for quantification of extravasation and binding in mice fashions of prostate most cancers. Med. Phys. 49, 6547–6559 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hysi, E. et al. Photoacoustic imaging biomarkers for monitoring biophysical modifications throughout nanobubble-mediated radiation therapy. Photoacoustics 20, 100201 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. The distinctive second wave phenomenon in distinction enhanced ultrasound imaging with nanobubbles. Sci. Rep. 12, 13619 (2022).
Google Scholar
Moore, M. J. et al. The dance of the nanobubbles: detecting acoustic backscatter from sub-micron bubbles utilizing ultra-high frequency acoustic microscopy. Nanoscale 12, 21420–21428 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bismuth, M. et al. Low frequency nanobubble-enhanced ultrasound mechanotherapy for noninvasive most cancers surgical procedure. Nanoscale 14, 13614–13627 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cooley, M. B. et al. Actual-time imaging of nanobubble ultrasound distinction agent circulation, extravasation, and diffusion by way of an extracellular matrix utilizing a microfluidic mannequin. Lab Chip 23, 3453–3466 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pellow, C., Abenojar, E. C., Exner, A. A., Zheng, G. & Goertz, D. E. Concurrent visible and acoustic monitoring of passive and energetic supply of nanobubbles to tumors. Theranostics 10, 11690–11706 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perera, R. H. et al. Intracellular vesicle entrapment of nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers focused to PSMA promotes extended enhancement and stability in vivo and in vitro. Nanotheranostics 6, 270–285 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wegierak, D. et al. Results of shell-integrated Sudan Black dye on the acoustic exercise and ultrasound imaging properties of lipid-shelled nanoscale ultrasound distinction brokers. J. Biomed. Choose. 27, 016501 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wegierak, D. et al. Decorrelation time mapping as an evaluation device for nanobubble-based distinction enhanced ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 46, 2370–2380 (2024).
Google Scholar
Johansen, M. L. et al. Ultrasound-based molecular imaging of tumors with PTPmu biomarker-targeted nanobubble distinction brokers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1983 (2021).
Google Scholar
Foudas, A. W. et al. Fundamentals and functions of nanobubbles: a evaluate. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 189, 64–86 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Growth of a novel castration-resistant orthotopic prostate most cancers mannequin in New Zealand white rabbit. Prostate 82, 695–705 (2022).
Google Scholar
Perera, R. H. et al. Enhancing efficiency of nanoscale ultrasound distinction brokers utilizing N,N-diethylacrylamide stabilization. Nanomedicine 13, 59–67 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yin, T. et al. Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors. Int. J. Nanomed. 7, 895–904 (2012).
Liu, J. et al. Ultrasound molecular imaging of acute cardiac transplantation rejection utilizing nanobubbles focused to T lymphocytes. Biomaterials 162, 200–207 (2018).
Google Scholar
de Leon, A. et al. Ultrasound distinction brokers and supply techniques in most cancers detection and remedy. Adv. Most cancers Res. 139, 57–84 (2018).
Perera, R. H. et al. Actual time ultrasound molecular imaging of prostate most cancers with PSMA-targeted nanobubbles. Nanomedicine 28, 102213 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Molecular imaging of orthotopic prostate most cancers with nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers focused to PSMA. Sci. Rep. 11, 4726 (2021).
Google Scholar
Abenojar, E. C. et al. Impact of bubble focus on the in vitro and in vivo efficiency of extremely steady lipid shell-stabilized micro- and nanoscale ultrasound distinction brokers. Langmuir 35, 10192–10202 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, Z. et al. Anti-G250 nanobody-functionalized nanobubbles focusing on renal cell carcinoma cells for ultrasound molecular imaging. Nanotechnology 31, 205101 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gao, Y. et al. Ultrasound molecular imaging of ovarian most cancers with CA-125 focused nanobubble distinction brokers. Nanomedicine 13, 2159–2168 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Q. et al. Manufacturing and characterization of a novel long-acting herceptin-targeted nanobubble distinction agent particular for Her-2-positive breast cancers. Breast Most cancers 23, 445–455 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-mediated biodegradable photoluminescent nanobubbles as ultrasound distinction brokers for focused breast most cancers imaging. Biomaterials 116, 106–117 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhu, L. et al. Development of ultrasonic nanobubbles carrying CAIX polypeptides to focus on carcinoma cells derived from varied organs. J. Nanobiotechnol. 15, 63 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fan, X. et al. Experimental investigation of the penetration of ultrasound nanobubbles in a gastric most cancers xenograft. Nanotechnology 24, 325102 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Preparation of multifunctional nanobubbles and their software in bimodal imaging and focused mixture remedy of early pancreatic most cancers. Sci. Rep. 11, 6254 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cooley, M. B. et al. Assessing therapeutic nanoparticle accumulation in tumors utilizing nanobubble-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. ACS Nano 18, 33181–33196 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xie, F. et al. Analysis of liver ischemia–reperfusion harm in rabbits utilizing a nanoscale ultrasound distinction agent focusing on ICAM-1. PLoS ONE 11, e0153805 (2016).
Google Scholar
Argenziano, M. et al. Vancomycin-loaded nanobubbles: a brand new platform for managed antibiotic supply in opposition to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Int. J. Pharm. 523, 176–188 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cavalli, R. et al. Preparation and in vitro characterization of chitosan nanobubbles as theranostic brokers. Colloids Surf. B 129, 39–46 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shen, J. et al. Resveratrol supply by ultrasound-mediated nanobubbles focusing on nucleus pulposus cells. Nanomedicine 13, 1433–1446 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nittayacharn, P., de Leon, A., Abenojar, E. C. & Exner, A. A. The impact of lipid solubilization on the efficiency of doxorubicin-loaded nanobubbles. In 2018 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 8579716 (IEEE, 2018).
Nittayacharn, P., Abenojar, E., De Leon, A., Wegierak, D. & Exner, A. A. Growing doxorubicin loading in lipid-shelled perfluoropropane nanobubbles through a easy deprotonation technique. Entrance. Pharmacol. 11, 644 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lin, W. et al. Cell-penetrating peptide-doxorubicin conjugate loaded NGR-modified nanobubbles for ultrasound triggered drug supply. J. Drug Goal. 24, 134–146 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Methotrexate-loaded PLGA nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging and synergistic focused remedy of residual tumor throughout HIFU ablation. Biomaterials 35, 5148–5161 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wang, J.-P. et al. Paclitaxel-loaded nanobubble focused to pro-gastrin-releasing peptide inhibits the expansion of small cell lung most cancers. Most cancers Manag. Res. 11, 6637–6649 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kida, H. et al. Environment friendly mRNA supply with lyophilized human serum albumin-based nanobubbles. Nanomaterials 13, 1283 (2023).
Google Scholar
Su, C. et al. Ultrasound-sensitive siRNA-loaded nanobubbles fabrication and antagonism in drug resistance for NSCLC. Drug Deliv. 29, 99–110 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kida, H. et al. Nanobubble mediated gene supply along with a hand-held ultrasound scanner. Entrance. Pharmacol. 11, 363 (2020).
Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y. et al. Supply of Na/I symporter gene into skeletal muscle utilizing nanobubbles and ultrasound: visualization of gene expression by PET. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 951–958 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yin, T. et al. Tumor-penetrating codelivery of siRNA and paclitaxel with ultrasound-responsive nanobubbles hetero-assembled from polymeric micelles and liposomes. Biomaterials 35, 5932–5943 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gao, J. et al. Ultrasound-assisted C3F8-filled PLGA nanobubbles for enhanced FGF21 supply and improved prophylactic therapy of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Acta Biomater. 130, 395–408 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mi, X. et al. Asparagine endopeptidase-targeted ultrasound-responsive nanobubbles alleviate tau cleavage and amyloid-β deposition in an Alzheimer’s illness mannequin. Acta Biomater. 141, 388–397 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yan, Y. et al. Mind supply of curcumin by way of low-intensity ultrasound-induced blood–mind barrier opening through lipid–PLGA nanobubbles. Int. J. Nanomed. 16, 7433–7447 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, B., Bing, C. & Chopra, R. The impact of transcranial targeted ultrasound goal location on the acoustic suggestions management efficiency throughout blood–mind barrier opening with nanobubbles. Sci. Rep. 9, 20020 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cheng, B. et al. Affect of nanobubble focus on blood–mind barrier opening utilizing targeted ultrasound beneath real-time acoustic suggestions management. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 2174–2187 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nittayacharn, P. et al. Environment friendly ultrasound-mediated drug supply to orthotopic liver tumors—direct comparability of doxorubicin-loaded nanobubbles and microbubbles. J. Management. Launch 367, 135–147 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Focused Sudan Black nanobubbles as photoacoustic distinction brokers for breast most cancers imaging. In Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019 (eds Oraevsky, A. A. & Wang, L. V.) 85 (SPIE, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2510876.
Nittayacharn, P. et al. Iridium(III) complex-loaded perfluoropropane nanobubbles for enhanced sonodynamic remedy. Bioconjug. Chem. 33, 1057–1068 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yi, X., Abenojar, E. C., Zhu, J., Zheng, Y. & Exner, A. A. In vitro preparation and characterization of magnetic nanobubbles. In 2019 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 392–395 (IEEE, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8925956.
Jin, Z. et al. Tumor focused multifunctional magnetic nanobubbles for MR/US twin imaging and targeted ultrasound triggered drug supply. Entrance. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 586874 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. et al. Magnetic polymeric nanobubbles with optimized core dimension for MRI/ultrasound bimodal molecular imaging of prostate most cancers. Nanomedicine 15, 2901–2916 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sojahrood, A. J. et al. Towards exactly controllable acoustic response of shell-stabilized nanobubbles: excessive yield and slim dispersity. ACS Nano 15, 4901–4915 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sojahrood, A. J. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of acoustic bubbles excited by their pressure-dependent subharmonic resonance frequency: affect of the stress amplitude, frequency, encapsulation and a number of bubble interactions on oversaturation and enhancement of the subharmonic sign. Nonlinear Dyn. 103, 429–466 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hernandez, C. et al. Sink or float? Characterization of shell-stabilized bulk nanobubbles utilizing a resonant mass measurement approach. Nanoscale 11, 851–855 (2019).
Google Scholar
Perera, R. H. et al. Nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers for enhanced supply of thermal sensitizer to tumors present process radiofrequency ablation. Pharm. Res. 31, 1407–1417 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hansen, H. H. W. B. et al. Nanobubble applied sciences: functions in remedy from molecular to mobile degree. Biotechnol. Adv. 63, 108091 (2023).
Google Scholar
Upadhyay, A. & Dalvi, S. V. microbubble formulations: synthesis, stability, modeling and biomedical functions. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 301–343 (2019).
Qin, S., Caskey, C. F. & Ferrara, Okay. W. Ultrasound distinction microbubbles in imaging and remedy: bodily rules and engineering. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, R27–R57 (2009).
Google Scholar
Batchelor, D. V. B. et al. Nanobubbles for therapeutic supply: manufacturing, stability and present prospects. Curr. Opi. Colloid Interface Sci. 54, 101456 (2021).
Google Scholar
Doinikov, A. A., Haac, J. F. & Dayton, P. A. Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles within the regime of nonlinear oscillations. Ultrasonics 49, 263–268 (2009).
Google Scholar
Krasovitski, B. & Kimmel, E. Stability of an encapsulated bubble shell. Ultrasonics 44, 216–220 (2006).
Google Scholar
Borden, M. A. et al. Affect of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Management 52, 1992–2002 (2005).
Google Scholar
Dicker, S. et al. Affect of shell composition on the resonance frequency of microbubble distinction brokers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 1292–1302 (2013).
Google Scholar
van Rooij, T. et al. Non-linear response and viscoelastic properties of lipid-coated microbubbles: DSPC versus DPPC. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 41, 1432–1445 (2015).
Google Scholar
Garg, S., Thomas, A. A. & Borden, M. A. The impact of lipid monolayer in-plane rigidity on in vivo microbubble circulation persistence. Biomaterials 34, 6862–6870 (2013).
Google Scholar
Batchelor, D. V. B. et al. The affect of nanobubble dimension and stability on ultrasound enhanced drug supply. Langmuir 38, 13943–13954 (2022).
Google Scholar
Park, B. et al. Stability of engineered micro or nanobubbles for biomedical functions. Pharmaceutics 12, 1089 (2020).
Google Scholar
Perera, R. et al. Nanobubble extravasation in prostate tumors imaged with ultrasound: function of energetic versus passive focusing on. In 2018 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 8580221 (IEEE, 2018).
Bosca, F., Bielecki, P. A., Exner, A. A. & Barge, A. Porphyrin-loaded pluronic nanobubbles: a brand new US-activated agent for future theranostic functions. Bioconjug. Chem. 29, 234–240 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nieves, L. M. et al. Impact of the surfactant pluronic on the soundness of lipid-stabilized perfluorocarbon nanobubbles. In 2017 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 8091542 (IEEE, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8091542.
Wu, H. et al. Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of latest nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 2137–2146 (2013).
Google Scholar
Counil, C., Abenojar, E., Perera, R. & Exner, A. A. Extrusion: a brand new technique for fast formulation of high-yield, monodisperse nanobubbles. Small 18, e2200810 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yu, Z. et al. G250 antigen-targeting drug-loaded nanobubbles mixed with ultrasound focused nanobubble destruction: a possible novel therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 81–95 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, H. et al. Nanobubble–Affibody: novel ultrasound distinction brokers for focused molecular ultrasound imaging of tumor. Biomaterials 37, 279–288 (2015).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y. et al. Preparation of nanobubbles modified with a small-molecule CXCR4 antagonist for focused drug supply to tumors and enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging. Int. J. Nanomed. 14, 9139–9157 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abenojar, E. C. et al. Theoretical and experimental gasoline quantity quantification of micro-and nanobubble ultrasound distinction brokers. Pharmaceutics 12, 208 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cooley, M. B., Wegierak, D. & Exner, A. A. Utilizing imaging modalities to foretell nanoparticle distribution and therapy efficacy in strong tumors: the rising function of ultrasound. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 16, e1957 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, S., Samiotaki, G., Olumolade, O., Feshitan, J. A. & Konofagou, E. E. Microbubble kind and distribution dependence of targeted ultrasound-induced blood–mind barrier opening. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 40, 130–137 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bernard, L. et al. ACT 2021 digital annual assembly poster abstracts. Int. J. Toxicol 41, 48–77 (2022).
Google Scholar
Perera, R. H. et al. Ultrasound-mediated drug-free theranostics for therapy of prostate most cancers. Bioact. Mater. 35, 45–55 (2024).
Google Scholar
Batchelor, D. V. B. et al. Nested nanobubbles for ultrasound-triggered drug launch. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07022 (2020).
Khan, M. S. et al. Engineering oxygen nanobubbles for the efficient reversal of hypoxia. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 46, 318–327 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ye, L. et al. Oxygen-loaded lipid nanobubbles for biofilm eradication by mixed trimodal therapy of oxygen, silver, and photodynamic remedy. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6, 11715–11724 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ho, Y.-J. et al. Oxygen-loaded microbubble-mediated sonoperfusion and oxygenation for neuroprotection after ischemic stroke reperfusion. Biomater. Res. 27, 65 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cooley, M. B. et al. The impact of nanobubble ultrasound distinction agent shell stiffness and temperature on stability and interactions with purple blood cells. In 2023 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 10307624 (IEEE, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1109/IUS51837.2023.10307624.
Reusser, T. D. et al. Phospholipid oxygen microbubbles for image-guided remedy. Nanotheranostics 4, 83–90 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pulsipher, Okay. W., Hammer, D. A., Lee, D. & Sehgal, C. M. Engineering theranostic microbubbles utilizing microfluidics for ultrasound imaging and remedy: a evaluate. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44, 2441–2460 (2018).
Google Scholar
Feshitan, J. A., Chen, C. C., Kwan, J. J. & Borden, M. A. Microbubble dimension isolation by differential centrifugation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 329, 316–324 (2009).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. E., Nittayacharn, P. & Exner, A. A. Progress and potential of nanobubbles for ultrasound-mediated drug supply. Professional Opin. Drug Deliv. 22, 1007–1030 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yuan, H. et al. Twin-targeted microbubbles particular to integrin αVβ3 and vascular endothelial development issue receptor 2 for ultrasonography analysis of tumor angiogenesis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44, 1460–1467 (2018).
Google Scholar
Endo-Takahashi, Y. & Negishi, Y. Microbubbles and nanobubbles with ultrasound for systemic gene supply. Pharmaceutics 12, 964 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nittayacharn, P., Dai, Okay., De Leon, A., Therdrattanawong, C. & Exner, A. A. The impact of freeze/thawing on the bodily properties and acoustic efficiency of perfluoropropane nanobubble suspensions. In 2019 IEEE Worldwide Ultrasonics Symposium 2279–2282 (IEEE, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926224.
Hernandez, C., Gulati, S., Fioravanti, G., Stewart, P. L. & Exner, A. A. Cryo-EM visualization of lipid and polymer-stabilized perfluorocarbon gasoline nanobubbles—a step in the direction of nanobubble mediated drug supply. Sci. Rep. 7, 13517 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mulvana, H. et al. Characterization of distinction agent microbubbles for ultrasound imaging and remedy analysis. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Management 64, 232–251 (2017).
Google Scholar
Satinover, S. J., Dove, J. D. & Borden, M. A. Single-particle optical sizing of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 40, 138–147 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sennoga, C. A. et al. Analysis of strategies for sizing and counting of ultrasound distinction brokers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38, 834–845 (2012).
Google Scholar
![[2605.23324] Enhancing Blood Cells Classification utilizing Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks](http://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png "[2605.23324] Enhancing Blood Cells Classification utilizing Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks"){kind=logo}
