![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/14Aug2026.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
![\"Three](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/capital-formation.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
Humorous factor about competitors: there’s each a pro-market and an anti-market case for a aggressive system.https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/08\/13\/one-chokable-throat\/#too-clever-by-half<\/p>\n
In case your principle is that markets ship prosperity by spurring companies to offer the superior services and products at decrease costs wanted to draw and retain employees and clients, then competitors is a must have. With out opponents, firms are “too massive to care”:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2024\/04\/04\/teach-me-how-to-shruggie\/#kagi<\/p>\n
In the meantime, should you assume that the strain of greed will all the time drive firms to cheat, and wish firms held in test by democratically accountable lawmakers and enforcers, you then additionally need competitors, as a result of in any other case, disorganized sectors of tons of of small companies collapse into oligarchic cartels. Members of those cartels stop to compete straight with each other and as a substitute collude to tear off employees and clients, leaving them aslosh in prepared money they’ll mobilize to seize regulators, securing an enshittogenic coverage surroundings that displays the simply arrived-at consensus that is solely potential if you boil a sector all the way down to a small handful of corporations, every of them “too massive to jail”:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2022\/06\/05\/regulatory-capture\/<\/p>\n
In different phrases: in case your very best is a world of high-quality services and products, produced by employees laboring below honest situations, delivered to customers at a good value, you then need competitors. Competitors scares some individuals into operating their companies ethically; and competitors ensures than an unethical operator might be held to account by authorities companies charged with defending employees and customers.<\/p>\n
When you perceive the position of competitors as a counter-oligarchic test on company energy, the rise of Large Tech and its authoritarian flip turns into a lot simpler to grasp.<\/p>\n
Tech is uniquely hospitable to competitors because of the intrinsic properties of digital computer systems. Formally, computer systems are “Turing-complete, common von Neumann machines,” which is to say that each pc can run each legitimate program. Which means that any enshittificatory gambit assayed by a tech firm \u2013 say, locking generic ink out of your printer; or blocking third celebration app shops on your cellphone or console; or sticking a dozen further adverts earlier than each Youtube video \u2013 is technically doomed.<\/p>\n
Each time a tech boss introduces a ten’ pile of shit to a digital services or products you depend on, they induce rival technologists to create 11′ ladders product of code that they’ll costlessly, instantaneously distribute to each one of many enshittifier’s clients and suppliers:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2019\/07\/adblocking-how-about-nah<\/p>\n
This explains the dynamism of early tech, which noticed firms rising rapidly to overcome their markets, solely to yield to the temptation to extract extra from clients and\/or suppliers whereas underinvesting in enhancements to their services and products. When this occurred, new digital firms sprang into being, reverse-engineering the incumbents’ merchandise and launching “complementary items” \u2013 plug-ins and mods \u2013 that mounted the defects in dominant merchandise, usurping the market chief’s place within the workflows and pocketbooks of its clients and suppliers:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2019\/10\/adversarial-interoperability<\/p>\n
For a few years, this “adversarial interoperability” labored its magic on the burgeoning tech sector, making a state of fixed ferment the place individuals who wished to enhance after which supplant the state-of-the-art have been in a position to cheaply enter and seize the market, solely to be taken down by the subsequent technology of disenshittifiers once they, too, inevitably yielded to the temptation to interchange innovation with extraction. Each pirate needs to be an admiral \u2013 however each admiral should then confront the pirates who rush in to fill the vacuum they create once they swap sides.<\/p>\n
However that system of useful disruption was itself disrupted \u2013 not by expertise, however by coverage. In 1998, Invoice Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Part 1201 of the DMCA makes it a felony to observe adversarial interoperability, establishing penalties of $500k and 5 years in jail for individuals who reverse engineer and modify merchandise:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/01\/14\/sole-and-despotic\/#world-turned-upside-down<\/p>\n
DMCA 1201 created a one-way ratchet that progressively narrowed the chances for tech competitors. As increasingly more US firms re-engineered their merchandise in order that modifying them would give rise to DMCA 1201 legal responsibility, American startups gave up on disrupting Large Tech, re-orienting in direction of “acqui-hires,” when a startup’s highest objective is to be absorbed by an enormous, sclerotic incumbent that mothballs its merchandise and assigns its engineers to work on incremental upkeep (or worse, enshittification) for its dominant choices.<\/p>\n
Large Tech’s pirates turned admirals, free to “disrupt” the weak and poor, whereas having fun with the authorized entitlement to destroy anybody who dared to disrupt them. They embodied Frank Wilhoit’s definition of conservativism: a category that the regulation that “protects however doesn’t bind” alongside a category that the regulation “binds however doesn’t defend”:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/07\/08\/wilhoitian\/#human-rights-v-property-rights<\/p>\n
It was superb for them to “transfer quick and break (our) issues,” however forbidden for us to “transfer quick and break kings.” Disruption for thee, by no means for me.<\/p>\n
Nor was this a merely American illness. Having neutered home opponents which may threaten its tech incumbents, the US authorities got down to forestall different nations from difficult its world-girdling tech empires. For the previous 25 years, the US Commerce Consultant has prioritized getting anticircumvention legal guidelines on the books of all of America’s buying and selling companions as a situation of free commerce with the US, with the end result that as we speak, just about each nation on the earth has a regulation that makes it unlawful to disrupt American tech giants:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/05\/05\/three-is-a-magic-number\/#coalitions<\/p>\n
Anti-circumvention regulation is so clearly, manifestly an invite to enshittify that when governments enacted these legal guidelines, they felt the necessity to embrace some form of “security valve” they may level to when critics raised anti-circumvention’s potential for abuse. The world’s would-be enshittifiers found out a devious methodology to insert clauses into anti-circumvention that seemed like anti-abuse measures, however which have been, in observe, ineffective ornaments.<\/p>\n
Many anti-circumvention legal guidelines \u2013 together with DMCA 1201 \u2013 have a course of for creating “exemptions” to the ban on reverse-engineering and modifying a tool. The best way these exemptions processes are written, they appear to say that if an organization makes use of anti-circumvention regulation to dam reliable exercise \u2013 say, if John Deere makes use of the regulation to cease you from fixing your individual tractor \u2013 then you possibly can go to some form of governing physique (within the US, it is the Copyright Workplace) and petition for an exemption to anti-circumvention. If that exemption is authorized, then making that modification turns into authorized.<\/p>\n
Earlier than I stick with it, let me say right here that even when that is how the system labored, it could nonetheless be grossly offensive. For those who purchase a tool \u2013 a automobile, a tractor, a printer, a console, a cellphone \u2013 it’s your property and you shouldn’t have to rent a lawyer to ask a authorities company to create a authorized exemption that allows you to do in any other case authorized issues with it. You shouldn’t must petition the federal government for the proper to purchase generic ink, use a third-party app retailer or take your automobile to an impartial mechanic.<\/p>\n
However this is not how the system works. It is a rip-off. Anti-circumvention exemptions are an inexpensive trick. They solely sound helpful. An inexpensive one who hears that the US Copyright Workplace has made it authorized to make use of a third-party app retailer along with your iPhone would assume that which means if somebody launches their very own app retailer, they’ll provide the instruments wanted to unlock your iPhone and activate their retailer.<\/p>\n
That is not how the DMCA exemptions course of works. Below the statute, the US Copyright Workplace is barely empowered to create “use exemptions,” which permit you, the proprietor of the iPhone, to utilize a instrument that unlocks your cellphone and installs the third-party app retailer. The Copyright Workplace doesn’t have the facility to create a instruments exemption that will enable somebody to make that unlocking instrument and promote or give it to you. Making that instrument stays a felony with a five-year jail sentence connected to it.<\/p>\n
What this implies is that if you wish to use your individual property in a method that was authorized earlier than DMCA 1201, that has been made authorized once more since you employed a lawyer who efficiently petitioned the US Copyright Workplace to grant an exemption, you possibly can solely accomplish that should you, personally reverse engineer your system to impact the permitted modifications to it.<\/p>\n
So: if the US Copyright Workplace legalizes various iPhone app shops, the one strategy to train this exemption is for each iPhone proprietor within the nation to get a pc science diploma, safe using a clean-room, decap the “safe enclave” on a spare iPhone’s CPU, extract its cryptographic keys, and combine them in a brand new model of iOS that they personally write and set up on their cellphone. No iPhone proprietor is allowed to debate how to do that with some other iPhone proprietor engaged in the identical venture, on penalty of a 5 12 months jail sentence.<\/p>\n
Clearly, that is ridiculous, and iPhones are simply the tip of the iceberg. It is also true if you wish to allow impartial restore of powered wheelchairs, whose manufacture is managed by a duopoly of private-equity backed firms which have all however deserted spending on restore, leaving wheelchair customers caught in mattress for months whereas they await service:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2022\/06\/when-drm-comes-your-wheelchair<\/p>\n
This absurd scenario is identical should you’re blind and need to make use of an exemption that allows you to reverse-engineer book codecs as a way to run your ebooks by a Braille printer, display reader or different assistive system. Below the exemptions guidelines for the world’s anti-circumvention legal guidelines, each blind particular person is predicted to personally reverse engineer the entry management methods constructed into Adobe and Amazon’s book codecs, write an exploit that lets them extract the textual content of those restricted ebooks after which repackage that textual content in a brand new, open format:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/03\/16\/whittle-a-webserver\/#mere-ornaments<\/p>\n
This “use exemption”\/”instruments exemption” break up is a near-perfect method of tricking individuals into considering that these legal guidelines are extra affordable than they seem. When Canada handed its landmark right-to-repair and interoperability legal guidelines in 2024, many celebrated \u2013 lacking the truth that below Canada’s anti-circumvention regulation (Invoice C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act of 2012), it stays unlawful to undertake the reverse-engineering wanted to train the rights these new legal guidelines (appeared to) enshrine:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/01\/29\/post-american-canada\/#ottawa<\/p>\n
For a quarter-century, I’ve made it my life’s work to clarify how unhealthy and harmful this technique is, and, fortunately, I’ve began to make slightly headway over the previous few years. My core viewers accommodates numerous hackers who’re rightly affronted on the existence of a physique of regulation that criminalizes the sorts of exploration and modification that they’ve devoted their lives to.<\/p>\n
Being hackers, they ponder this case and begin to consider how they’ll hack the regulation to flee it. Simply these days, I’ve heard from lots of people who assume they’ll clear up this drawback by asking a chatbot to reverse-engineer and modify the firmware on their tractors, wheelchairs, ebooks, iPhones, what-have-you. You’ll be able to’t put a chatbot in jail for violating anti-circumvention regulation, proper?<\/p>\n
I remorse to tell you that should you did this in a method that rose to the eye of a giant company bully, they would not blame your chatbot for writing the exploit: they’d blame you for prompting the chatbot to create this new instrument.<\/p>\n
Simply yesterday, I heard from a reader who had a intelligent concept: what should you gave your unmodified iPhone to a hacker who knew tips on how to set up a third-party app retailer on it, and so they modified that cellphone, after which bought it again to you for $10? The hacker can be making a use exemption, not a instruments exemption.<\/p>\n
This, too, is not going to produce the result we’re in search of. Even when Apple cannot persuade a choose that promoting you a modified iPhone is “trafficking” in a circumvention system (a really massive “if”), this wheeze misses the broader level about how adversarial interoperability was in a position to disenshittify tech for the years when tech firms weren’t simply allotting disruption, but additionally being disrupted themselves.<\/p>\n
The interoperability-driven dynamism that disciplined or displaced tech firms that abused their market energy was a mass phenomenon. The printer cartel would not want to have the ability to cost everybody $10,000\/gallon for ink. If a number of individuals on the margins work out tips on how to jailbreak their printers, that does not cease the grift. Even higher if the individuals who do use generic ink need to rely on nameless, shadowy companies that do not have customer support departments you possibly can name when your printer will get an replace that breaks ink compatibility, or an handle you possibly can ship a process-server to should you’re caught with 1000’s of {dollars}’ value of ineffective ink cartridges after a kind of updates.<\/p>\n
To make generic ink a viable test towards the abuses of HP and its coloured water mafia, you want a counter-industry. You want salespeople making calls on massive enterprises who purchase their ink by the ocean, providing them a greater deal and a assure of uninterrupted service. To make good on that assure, you want a military of hackers who reverse-engineer each software program replace HP pushes out in a matter of hours, and also you want one other military of customer support reps who assist individuals who cannot work out tips on how to set up that replace.<\/p>\n
As economists would say, you want “capital formation.” You want the flexibility to lift or borrow cash, a mailing handle, an advert marketing campaign, cubicles at conferences and free samples within the mail. You want to have the ability to present potential clients that you’re insured within the occasion that you just brick their units, so switching to your product would not endanger their capital investments. You should have a enterprise whose doorways might be crushed down by regulators within the occasion that you just use your after-market mods as a instrument to steal information or cash out of your clients.<\/p>\n
To grasp how this labored, forged your thoughts again to the Workplace Suite Wars of the early 2000s. Again then, Microsoft dominated the desktop world, controlling extra that 95% of the PC OSes, a share so massive and so ruthlessly acquired and maintained that they have been convicted of violating anti-trust legal guidelines.<\/p>\n
Microsoft used unlawful tying and predatory pricing to push each a kind of PC house owners into utilizing Microsoft Workplace, which meant that even should you used a Mac, 19 occasions out of 20, the individuals you wanted to collaborate with on memos, spreadsheets and slide-decks have been utilizing MS Workplace.<\/p>\n
Microsoft made a model of Workplace for the Mac, but it surely was the only most curs\u00e9d piece of packaged software program ever provided to the market. Merely waving the Mac Workplace floppy round a office would trigger recordsdata to spontaneously go corrupt on random PCs within the neighborhood.<\/p>\n
For Mac customers, this meant that 95% of the time, they may not reliably collaborate with different pc customers. For individuals like me \u2013 then a contract CIO-for-hire who was serving to small companies join their computer systems to one another and the web \u2013 it meant that more and more, we made CEOs swap their Powerbooks for Thinkpads and designers swap their PowerPCs for Dells with beefy graphics playing cards, shifting the entire enterprise to PC\/Home windows.<\/p>\n
Apple solved this drawback by reverse-engineering MS Workplace and producing the iWork Suite: Pages, Numbers and Keynote, which might completely learn and write Microsoft’s Phrase, Excel and Powerpoint recordsdata. That adversarial interoperability saved the corporate, however the gambit wasn’t one-and-done.<\/p>\n
Microsoft spent the subsequent a number of years maliciously introducing adjustments to the Workplace file codecs that broke compatibility with iWork, which Apple countered by paying a military of coders to swiftly analyze these new codecs and replace iWork to take care of compatibility with them:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2019\/06\/adversarial-interoperability-reviving-elegant-weapon-more-civilized-age-slay<\/p>\n
I feel Apple was fated to win this costly cat-and-mouse sport, if solely they may hold in there lengthy sufficient. For each Mac within the area, Microsoft was supporting 19 PCs, and these computer systems ran a fragmented mosaic of Home windows and Workplace variations. Each time Microsoft broke compatibility with Workplace to mess up one Mac consumer, additionally they tousled 19 PC customers, all of whom needed to be patched and up to date to take care of compatibility. This gave Apple a strong benefit that mounted with each flip of the sport, so all they needed to do was hold in there till the asymmetrical prices overwhelmed Microsoft.<\/p>\n
Which is what occurred. Finally, Microsoft sued for peace and agreed to standardize the workplace file-formats on the Worldwide Requirements Group, ushering in an period of unprecedented compatibility. This ISO standardization is why now you can paste styled textual content from the Phrase software right into a browser-based Google Doc or an application-based LibreOffice window. It is also a sport Microsoft continues to cheat at, with a string of soiled tips meant to leverage its dominance to close out opponents altogether:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/weblog.documentfoundation.org\/weblog\/2026\/07\/17\/microsofts-main-tool-for-lock-in\/<\/p>\n
The rise (and impending fall) of a very open format that lets each pc consumer collaborate on any doc is an object lesson within the mixed position that adversarial interoperability and capital formation play in disenshittifying expertise. For Microsoft, a “competitor” is not one hacker who can open a Phrase file in a program of their very own devising, neither is a “competitor” the small variety of customers that single competitor can assist.<\/p>\n
Microsoft is an incorrigible, bullying cheat with a sick and rotten company tradition: to cease the form of ruthless princeling who rises to a place of energy in an organization like Microsoft from turning predatory requires extreme, apparent penalties that observe straight from any extractive gambit.<\/p>\n
To muster that form of competitors requires the form of capital formation you solely get from true legalization, not the anemic sham provided by anti-circumvention’s “exemptions.” Even the place the competitors is unfold out throughout many shifting small companies and people, the system of competitors requires a steady backstop that produces the instruments these small corporations depend on.<\/p>\n
In 2014, Ofcom, the UK’s telecoms regulator, affirmed that Britons had the proper to unlock their telephones, even when their service had bought them a cellphone that was locked to its community. In a single day, each small store acquired a phone-unlocking side-hustle. One morning as I walked from my flat to the tube, I handed three unlockers: one at a newsagent’s, the place they might take your cellphone and return it unlocked inside a day; one at my dry-cleaner’s, the place a man with a folding card desk would unlock your cellphone when you waited; and one other folding desk man proper by the tube entrance who’d additionally work when you waited, and who charged \u00a35 lower than the man on the dry-cleaner’s.<\/p>\n
None of those individuals have been electrical engineers or software program builders or hackers. They only adopted recipes that have been offered by one of some well-capitalized corporations that bought them a subscription to jailbreaking instruments that have been saved updated for each make and mannequin of each cellphone.<\/p>\n
One frequent excuse for the ban on restore instruments for automobiles or wheelchairs or tractors is that these units are actually so computerized that they require specialised data if they’re to be safely serviced. Even when that is true, that is precisely what a authorized toolchain gives.<\/p>\n
The man who mounted my photo voltaic panels wasn’t a software program engineer, he was an electrician who had the customer-service cellphone quantity for the corporate that made my photo voltaic inverter. If that firm had a viable competitor who might supply their very own firmware for my photo voltaic set up and was hungry for my enterprise, perhaps that technician would have gotten by in three minutes relatively than three hours.<\/p>\n
And if that various firmware was faulty, then I might be a part of a category motion go well with and get made complete \u2013 one thing that’s practically not possible to think about taking place with photo voltaic OEMs, who face so little competitors that all of them put binding arbitration clauses of their phrases of service that take away your proper to sue, irrespective of whether or not they cheat you or burn your own home down:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2026\/05\/06\/champerty-loves-company\/#circle-of-life<\/p>\n
That is the wonderful factor about digital instruments. By means of software program, specialists are in a position to bundle up their experience into self-executing code, which may costlessly, instantaneously be distributed to everybody on the earth who wants it. However paying these specialists is not low cost, and neither is supporting their instruments.<\/p>\n
I really like William Gibson’s maxim that “the road finds its personal use for issues,” however if you cannot neutralize a big, harmful monopolist with particular person tinkering \u2013 the most effective you possibly can hope for is a few measure of particular person aid..<\/p>\n
It is true that in these adversarial interoperability fights, the upstarts get pleasure from an incredible benefit, however that benefit is not infinite. For the guerrillas to outlast the empire, they’ve to have the ability to wage a protracted, persistent combat.<\/p>\n
To marshal the assets wanted to maintain that combat and to take care of the logistics demanded by its provide traces requires the nice guys to be allowed to combat within the open, with out the looming risk of prison prosecution, a risk that forecloses on capitalization and mass adoption.<\/p>\n
Enshittification is not downstream of cruelty, it is downstream of greed. The purpose of enshittification is to use the management a agency can train over the purchasers, suppliers and employees it holds captive so as to extract extra from them. The titanic income this exploitation delivers are a strong lure for would-be disenshittifiers and buyers who would fund their liberatory revolution.<\/p>\n
Do not get me flawed, I really like my hackers and I sit in awe of the superior leverage of writing code that may be costlessly, instantaneously distributed to everybody who wants it. However as long as governments and the regulation are on the facet of extraction and enshittification, the disenshittificatory insurgency can be starved of assets, condemned to stay marginal and insufficient.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/heylookatthis3.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/worlds-famous-events.png?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
#25yrsago Berkeley Breathed: the Onion interview https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20011201062719\/http:\/\/www.theonionavclub.com\/avclub3728\/avfeature_3728.html<\/p>\n
#25yrsago Chinese language going cellular loopy http:\/\/information.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hello\/world\/asia-pacific\/1492584.stm<\/p>\n
#25yrsago Free wifi in NYC https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20011024070700\/http:\/\/www.villagevoice.com\/points\/0133\/meyers.php<\/p>\n
#20yrsago RIAA\u2019s \u201cabundance of sensitivity\u201d ends harassment of grieving household https:\/\/memex.craphound.com\/2006\/08\/14\/london-copyfighters-speak-at-speakers-corner-on-aug-27\/<\/p>\n
#20yrsago London Copyfighters: Converse at Speaker\u2019s Nook on Aug 27! https:\/\/memex.craphound.com\/2006\/08\/14\/london-copyfighters-speak-at-speakers-corner-on-aug-27\/<\/p>\n
#20yrsago TSA wins the battle on lipstick https:\/\/memex.craphound.com\/2006\/08\/14\/tsa-wins-the-war-on-lipstick\/<\/p>\n
#15yrsago RIP Paul Meier, father of the randomized trial https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/08\/13\/well being\/13meier.html?_r=1<\/p>\n
#15yrsago Lengthy Seaside Police Chief: we detain photographers, and I don\u2019t have any tips for that coverage, pictures is classed with makes an attempt to accumulate weaponized smallpox https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20110927230257\/http:\/\/www.lbpost.com\/life\/greggory\/12188<\/p>\n
#15yrsago David Cameron\u2019s net-censorship proposal earns kudos from Chinese language state media https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20110815220203\/https:\/\/www.globaltimes.cn\/NEWS\/tabid\/99\/articleType\/ArticleView\/articleId\/670718\/Riots-lead-to-rethink-of-Web-freedom.aspx<\/p>\n
#15yrsago Empirical manners: in direction of a science of harmonious norms https:\/\/www.antipope.org\/charlie\/blog-static\/2011\/08\/rewilding-etiquette.html<\/p>\n
#15yrsago Tiki Room resurgent https:\/\/passport2dreams.blogspot.com\/2011\/08\/every-cloud-has-silver-lining.html<\/p>\n
#10yrsago After New Zealand spooks misidentified pro-democracy activist, NSA spied on him for them https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160815040057\/https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2016\/08\/14\/nsa-gcsb-prism-surveillance-fullman-fiji\/<\/p>\n
#10yrsago Even the woo {industry} thinks Gwyneth Paltrow\u2019s \u201csmoothie mud\u201d adverts are an excessive amount of https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160811225548\/https:\/\/consumerist.com\/2016\/08\/09\/ad-and-supplement-self-regulation-groups-have-issues-with-gwyneth-paltrows-smoothie-dusts\/<\/p>\n
#10yrsago It\u2019s fairly simple to hack visitors lights https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/system\/recordsdata\/convention\/woot14\/woot14-ghena.pdf<\/p>\n
#10yrsago Personal jail contractor\u2019s $1B no-bid deal to run immigration jails ensures 100% occupancy payouts https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160815022103\/https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/enterprise\/economic system\/inside-the-administrations-1-billion-deal-to-detain-central-american-asylum-seekers\/2016\/08\/14\/e47f1960-5819-11e6-9aee-8075993d73a2_story.html<\/p>\n
#10yrsago Courtroom of Attraction reverses Labour disenfranchisement ruling, however Corbyn nonetheless prone to win https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160813134816\/http:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/politics\/staggers\/2016\/08\/high-courts-judgement-wont-stop-jeremy-corbyn-winning<\/p>\n
#10yrsago John Oliver on subprime auto-lending and its killswitches https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160816154135\/https:\/\/consumerist.com\/2016\/08\/15\/john-oliver-keegan-michael-key-explain-why-subprime-car-loans-are-so-awful\/<\/p>\n
#10yrsago Worst of McMansions: architectural criticism of inequality\u2019s most tangible proof https:\/\/net.archive.org\/net\/20160814031109\/http:\/\/mcmansionhell.tumblr.com\/<\/p>\n
#5yrsago Provocateur copyrights a Magic: The Gathering Deck https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2021\/08\/14\/angels-and-demons\/#owning-culture<\/p>\n
#5yrsago Disneyland at a stroll https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2021\/08\/15\/disneyland-at-a-stroll-part-vi\/<\/p>\n
#1yrago Bluesky creates the world’s weirdest, hardest-to-understand binding arbitration clause https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2025\/08\/15\/dogs-breakfast\/#by-clicking-this-you-agree-on-behalf-of-your-employer-to-release-me-from-all-obligations-and-waivers-arising-from-any-and-all-NON-NEGOTIATED-agreements<\/p>\n
#1yrago “Privateness preserving age verification” is bullshit https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2025\/08\/14\/bellovin\/#wont-someone-think-of-the-cryptographers<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/appearances3.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/recentappearances3.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/recent.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
“The Reverse-Centaur’s Information to AI,” a brief e book about being a greater AI critic, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, June 2026https:\/\/us.macmillan.com\/books\/9780374621568\/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai\/<\/p>\n
“Canny Valley”: A restricted version assortment of the collages I create for Pluralistic, self-published, September 2025 https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/2025\/09\/04\/illustrious\/#chairman-bruce<\/p>\n
“Enshittification: Why The whole lot All of the sudden Bought Worse and What to Do About It,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, October 7 2025https:\/\/us.macmillan.com\/books\/9780374619329\/enshittification\/<\/p>\n
“Picks and Shovels”: a sequel to “Pink Workforce Blues,” in regards to the heroic period of the PC, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2025 (https:\/\/us.macmillan.com\/books\/9781250865908\/picksandshovels).<\/p>\n
“The Bezzle”: a sequel to “Pink Workforce Blues,” about prison-tech and different grifts, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), February 2024 (thebezzle.org).<\/p>\n
“The Misplaced Trigger:” a solarpunk novel of hope within the local weather emergency, Tor Books (US), Head of Zeus (UK), November 2023 (http:\/\/lost-cause.org).<\/p>\n
“The Web Con”: A nonfiction e book about interoperability and Large Tech (Verso) September 2023 (http:\/\/seizethemeansofcomputation.org). Signed copies at Ebook Soup (https:\/\/www.booksoup.com\/e book\/9781804291245).<\/p>\n
“Pink Workforce Blues”: “A grabby, compulsive thriller that may depart you understanding extra about how the world works than you probably did earlier than.” Tor Books http:\/\/redteamblues.com.<\/p>\n
“Chokepoint Capitalism: Find out how to Beat Large Tech, Tame Large Content material, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin”, on tips on how to unrig the markets for inventive labor, Beacon Press\/Scribe 2022 https:\/\/chokepointcapitalism.com<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/upcoming-books.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
“The Publish-American Web,” a geopolitical sequel of types to Enshittification, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2027<\/p>\n
“Unauthorized Bread”: a middle-grades graphic novel tailored from my novella about refugees, toasters and DRM, FirstSecond, April 20, 2027<\/p>\n
“Enshittification, Why The whole lot All of the sudden Bought Worse and What to Do About It” (the graphic novel), Firstsecond, 2027<\/p>\n
“The Memex Technique,” Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2027<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/colophon2.jpg?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
Right this moment’s high sources:<\/p>\n
Presently writing:<\/p>\n
\u201cAs soon as Is Enemy Motion,\u201d a science fiction novel in regards to the origins of contemporary technofascism. Right this moment’s phrases: 570 (5421 whole).<\/p>\n
“The Publish-American Web,” a sequel to “Enshittification,” in regards to the higher world the remainder of us get to have now that Trump has torched America. Fourth draft accomplished. Submitted to editor.<\/p>\n
A Little Brother brief story about DIY insulin PLANNING<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/craphound.com\/images\/by.svg.png?w=840&ssl=1\"\/)
<\/p>\n
This work \u2013 excluding any serialized fiction \u2013 is licensed below a Inventive Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Which means you need to use it any method you want, together with commercially, offered that you just attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and embrace a hyperlink to pluralistic.internet.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/<\/p>\n
Quotations and pictures aren’t included on this license; they’re included both below a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the idea of a separate license. Please train warning.<\/p>\n
Weblog (no adverts, monitoring, or data-collection):<\/p>\n
Pluralistic.internet<\/p>\n
E-newsletter (no adverts, monitoring, or data-collection):<\/p>\n
https:\/\/pluralistic.internet\/plura-list<\/p>\n
Mastodon (no adverts, monitoring, or data-collection):<\/p>\n
https:\/\/mamot.fr\/@pluralistic<\/p>\n
Bluesky (no adverts, potential monitoring and data-collection):<\/p>\n
https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/doctorow.pluralistic.internet<\/p>\n
Medium (no adverts, paywalled):<\/p>\n
https:\/\/doctorow.medium.com\/<\/p>\n
Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and promoting):<\/p>\n
https:\/\/mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com\/tagged\/pluralistic<\/p>\n
“When life offers you SARS, you make sarsaparilla” -Joey “Accordion Man” DeVilla<\/p>\n
READ CAREFULLY: By studying this, you agree, on behalf of your employer, to launch me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use insurance policies (“BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I’ve entered into along with your employer, its companions, licensors, brokers and assigns, in perpetuity, with out prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You additional symbolize that you’ve got the authority to launch me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.<\/p>\n
ISSN: 3066-764X<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n