Stalder, J. et al. Tissue-specific DNA cleavages within the globin chromatin area launched by DNAase I. Cell 20, 451–460 (1980).
Google Scholar
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for quick and delicate epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome place. Nat. Strategies 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bulyk, M. L. DNA microarray applied sciences for measuring protein–DNA interactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 422–430 (2006).
Google Scholar
O’Neill, L. P. & Turner, B. M. Histone H4 acetylation distinguishes coding areas of the human genome from heterochromatin in a differentiation-dependent however transcription-independent method. EMBO J. 14, 3946–3957 (1995).
Google Scholar
Kasinathan, S., Orsi, G. A., Zentner, G. E., Ahmad, Okay. & Henikoff, S. Excessive-resolution mapping of transcription issue binding websites on native chromatin. Nat. Strategies 11, 203–209 (2014).
Google Scholar
Minnoye, L. et al. Chromatin accessibility profiling strategies. Nat. Rev. Strategies Primers 1, 10 (2021).
Google Scholar
van Steensel, B. & Henikoff, S. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins utilizing tethered Dam methyltransferase. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 424–428 (2000). This examine launched DamID, the unique DNA methyltransferase-tethering methodology for in vivo and in situ chromatin profiling.
Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., Ahmad, Okay. & Henikoff, S. CUT&Tag information processing and evaluation tutorial. Protocols.io https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bjk2kkye (2020).
Google Scholar
Heyl, F. & Videm, P. CUT&RUN information evaluation. Galaxy Coaching Supplies https://coaching.galaxyproject.org/training-material/subjects/epigenetics/tutorials/cut_and_run/tutorial.html (2025).
van Steensel, B., Delrow, J. & Henikoff, S. Chromatin profiling utilizing focused DNA adenine methyltransferase. Nat. Genet. 27, 304–308 (2001).
Google Scholar
Schmid, M., Durussel, T. & Laemmli, U. Okay. ChIC and ChEC; genomic mapping of chromatin proteins. Mol. Cell 16, 147–157 (2004). This examine launched ChEC and ChIC, the unique nuclease-tethering methods for high-resolution in situ chromatin profiling.
Skene, P. J. & Henikoff, S. An environment friendly focused nuclease technique for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding websites. eLife 6, e21856 (2017). This examine launched CUT&RUN for high-resolution in situ epigenomics.
Google Scholar
Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for environment friendly epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019). This examine launched CUT&Tag for tagmentation-based bulk and single-cell in situ epigenomics, the essential protocol for a number of extensively used variations and extensions.
Google Scholar
Carter, B. et al. Mapping histone modifications in low cell quantity and single cells utilizing antibody-guided chromatin tagmentation (ACT-seq). Nat. Commun. 10, 3747 (2019).
Google Scholar
Harada, A. et al. A chromatin integration labelling methodology permits epigenomic profiling with decrease enter. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 287–296 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. CoBATCH for high-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling. Mol. Cell 76, 206–216.e7 (2019).
Google Scholar
van Schaik, T., Manzo, S. G. & van Steensel, B. Genome-wide mapping and microscopy visualization of protein–DNA interactions by pA-DamID. Strategies Mol. Biol. 2458, 215–229 (2022).
Google Scholar
Maslan, A. et al. Mapping protein–DNA interactions with DiMeLo-seq. Nat. Protoc. 19, 3697–3720 (2024).
Google Scholar
Khyzha, N., Henikoff, S. & Ahmad, Okay. Profiling RNA at chromatin targets in situ by antibody-targeted tagmentation. Nat. Strategies 19, 1383–1392 (2022). This examine launched RT&Tag for RNA-based epigenomics and nuclear compartment profiling.
Google Scholar
Khyzha, N., Ahmad, Okay. & Henikoff, S. Profiling transcriptome composition and dynamics inside nuclear compartments utilizing SLAM-RT&Tag. Mol. Cell 85, 1366–1380.e4 (2025).
Google Scholar
Meers, M. P., Llagas, G., Janssens, D. H., Codomo, C. A. & Henikoff, S. Multifactorial profiling of epigenetic landscapes at single-cell decision utilizing MulTI-Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 708–716 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gopalan, S., Wang, Y., Harper, N. W., Garber, M. & Fazzio, T. G. Simultaneous profiling of a number of chromatin proteins in the identical cells. Mol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.019 (2021). This examine confirmed that Multi-CUT&Tag permits multifactorial in situ chromatin profiling.
Google Scholar
Janssens, D. H. et al. CUT&Tag2for1: a modified methodology for simultaneous profiling of the accessible and silenced regulome in single cells. Genome Biol. 23, 81 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xie, Y. et al. Droplet-based single-cell joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1428–1433 (2023). This examine described an environment friendly methodology for acquiring in situ chromatin profiles and RNA sequencing from the identical single cells.
Google Scholar
Xiong, H., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Yu, X. & He, A. Single-cell joint detection of chromatin occupancy and transcriptome permits higher-dimensional epigenomic reconstructions. Nat. Strategies 18, 652–660 (2021).
Google Scholar
Solar, Z. et al. Joint single-cell multiomic evaluation in Wnt3a induced uneven stem cell division. Nat. Commun. 12, 5941 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bartosovic, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Multimodal chromatin profiling utilizing nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 794–805 (2023). This examine described multimodal in situ epigenomic profiling for a number of histone modifications and ATAC–seq from the identical single cells.
Google Scholar
Chi, W. Y. et al. Single-cell mapping of regulatory DNA:protein interactions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.31.630903 (2025).
Janssens, D. H. et al. Automated in situ chromatin profiling effectively resolves cell sorts and gene regulatory applications. Epigenetics Chromatin 11, 74 (2018).
Google Scholar
Janssens, D. H. et al. Automated CUT&Tag profiling of chromatin heterogeneity in mixed-lineage leukemia. Nat. Genet. 53, 1586–1596 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bomsztyk, Okay. et al. PIXUL-ChIP: built-in high-throughput pattern preparation and analytical platform for epigenetic research. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e69 (2019).
Google Scholar
Noll, M. Subunit construction of chromatin. Nature 251, 249–251 (1974).
Google Scholar
Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning within the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).
Google Scholar
Henikoff, J. G., Belsky, J. A., Krassovsky, Okay., Macalpine, D. M. & Henikoff, S. Epigenome characterization at single base-pair decision. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18318–18323 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kubik, S. et al. Nucleosome stability distinguishes two completely different promoter sorts in any respect protein-coding genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 60, 422–434 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chereji, R. V., Bryson, T. D. & Henikoff, S. Quantitative MNase-seq precisely maps nucleosome occupancy ranges. Genome Biol. 20, 198 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brahma, S. & Henikoff, S. RSC-associated subnucleosomes outline MNase-sensitive promoters in yeast. Mol. Cell 73, 238–249.e3 (2019). This examine launched CUT&RUN.ChIP, through which focused nuclease cleavage and launch is adopted by chromatin immunoprecipitation.
Google Scholar
Meers, M. P., Janssens, D. H. & Henikoff, S. Pioneer issue–nucleosome binding occasions throughout differentiation are motif encoded. Mol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.025 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ramachandran, S., Ahmad, Okay. & Henikoff, S. Transcription and transforming produce asymmetrically unwrapped nucleosomal intermediates. Mol. Cell 68, 1038–1053.e4 (2017).
Google Scholar
Koidl, S. & Timmers, H. T. M. greenCUT&RUN: environment friendly genomic profiling of GFP-tagged transcription elements and chromatin regulators. Curr. Protoc. 1, e266 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nizamuddin, S. et al. Integrating quantitative proteomics with correct genome profiling of transcription elements by greenCUT&RUN. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e49 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. et al. The nanoCUT&RUN approach visualizes telomeric chromatin in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010351 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dimitriu, M. A., Arzate-Mejia, R. G., Steg, L. C., Germain, P. L. & Mansuy, I. M. NanoTag is an improved methodology to map interactions between DNA and proteins not requiring IgG. Sci. Rep. 15, 28672 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. scNanoSeq-CUT&Tag: a single-cell long-read CUT&Tag sequencing methodology for environment friendly chromatin modification profiling inside particular person cells. Nat. Strategies 21, 2044–2057 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sarthy, J. F. et al. Histone deposition pathways decide the chromatin landscapes of H3.1 and H3.3 K27M oncohistones. eLife 9, 61090 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ahmad, Okay. & Spens, A. E. Separate Polycomb Response Parts management chromatin state and activation of the vestigial gene. PLoS Genet. 15, e1007877 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brahma, S. & Henikoff, S. The BAF chromatin remodeler synergizes with RNA polymerase II and transcription elements to evict nucleosomes. Nat. Genet. 56, 100–111 (2024).
Google Scholar
Brahma, S. & Henikoff, S. CUT&RUN profiling of the budding yeast epigenome. Strategies Mol. Biol. 2477, 129–147 (2022).
Google Scholar
Reznikoff, W. S. Tn5 as a mannequin for understanding DNA transposition. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 1199–1206 (2003).
Google Scholar
Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin panorama of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kaya-Okur, H. S., Janssens, D. H., Henikoff, J. G., Ahmad, Okay. & Henikoff, S. Environment friendly low-cost chromatin profiling with CUT&Tag. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3264–3283 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hunold, P. et al. DynaTag for environment friendly mapping of transcription elements in low-input samples and at single-cell decision. Nat. Commun. 16, 6585 (2025).
Google Scholar
Brooks, J. E., Blumenthal, R. M. & Gingeras, T. R. The isolation and characterization of the Escherichia coli DNA adenine methylase (dam) gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 835–851 (1983).
Google Scholar
Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D. & van Steensel, B. Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions utilizing DamID in mammalian cells. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1467–1478 (2007).
Google Scholar
Szczesnik, T., Ho, J. W. Okay. & Sherwood, R. Dam mutants present improved sensitivity and spatial decision for profiling transcription issue binding. Epigenetics Chromatin 12, 36 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chudzik, Okay. et al. Reconfiguration of genome–lamina interactions marks the commissioning of limb cell-fates. Preprint at biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.05.651267 (2025).
Pindyurin, A. V., Pagie, L., Kozhevnikova, E. N., van Arensbergen, J. & van Steensel, B. Inducible DamID programs for genomic mapping of chromatin proteins in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5646–5657 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schuster, E. et al. DamID in C. elegans reveals longevity-associated targets of DAF-16/FoxO. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 399 (2010).
Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M., Hinckley, W. E., Leonelli, L., Brooks, M. D. & Coruzzi, G. M. DamID-seq: a genome-wide DNA methylation methodology that captures each transient and steady TF–DNA interactions in plant cells. Strategies Mol. Biol. 2698, 87–107 (2023).
Google Scholar
Araki, Okay., Araki, M. & Yamamura, Okay. Website-directed integration of the cre gene mediated by Cre recombinase utilizing a mix of mutant lox websites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e103 (2002).
Google Scholar
Marshall, O. J., Southall, T. D., Cheetham, S. W. & Model, A. H. Cell-type-specific profiling of protein-DNA interactions with out cell isolation utilizing focused DamID with next-generation sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1586–1598 (2016).
Google Scholar
van den Ameele, J. et al. Focused DamID detects cell-type-specific histone modifications in intact tissues or organisms. PLoS Biol. 23, e3002944 (2025). This examine described inducible in vivo single-cell profiling of histone modifications based mostly on Focused DamID.
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, L., Zhong, B. & Dai, Z. Protein splicing of inteins: a robust software in artificial biology. Entrance. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 810180 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rang, F. J. et al. Single-cell profiling of transcriptome and histone modifications with EpiDamID. Mol. Cell 82, 1956–1970.e14 (2022). This examine confirmed joint in vivo profiling of histone modifications and transcription based mostly on DamID.
Google Scholar
Borsos, M. et al. Genome–lamina interactions are established de novo within the early mouse embryo. Nature 569, 729–733 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rullens, P. M. J. et al. MeCP2 binding and genome–lamina reorganization precede lengthy gene activation throughout mouse corticogenesis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.01.673434 (2025).
Sobecki, M. et al. MadID, a flexible strategy to map protein–DNA Interactions, highlights telomere-nuclear envelope contact websites in human cells. Cell Rep. 25, 2891–2903.e5 (2018).
Google Scholar
Di, L. et al. RNA sequencing by direct tagmentation of RNA/DNA hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2886–2893 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lu, B. et al. Transposase-assisted tagmentation of RNA/DNA hybrid duplexes. eLife 9, e54919 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gagliardi, M. & Matarazzo, M. R. RIP: RNA immunoprecipitation. Strategies Mol. Biol. 1480, 73–86 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fang, J. et al. PIRCh-seq: practical classification of non-coding RNAs related to distinct histone modifications. Genome Biol. 20, 292 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mondal, T., Subhash, S. & Kanduri, C. Chromatin RNA Immunoprecipitation (ChRIP). Strategies Mol. Biol. 1689, 65–76 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dominissini, D. et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485, 201–206 (2012).
Google Scholar
Meyer, Okay. D. et al. Complete evaluation of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and close to cease codons. Cell 149, 1635–1646 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ding, C. et al. Simultaneous profiling of chromatin-associated RNA at focused DNA loci and RNA–RNA interactions by TaDRIM-seq. Nat. Commun. 16, 1500 (2025). This examine described an in situ epigenomic methodology for mapping RNA–DNA and RNA–RNA interactions within the neighborhood of chromatin epitopes.
Google Scholar
Cheng, Q. X. et al. Co-profiling of in situ RNA–protein interactions and transcriptome in single cells and tissues. Nat. Strategies 22, 1824–1835 (2025).
Google Scholar
Abbasova, L. et al. CUT&Tag recovers as much as half of ENCODE ChIP-seq histone acetylation peaks. Nat. Commun. 16, 2993 (2025).
Google Scholar
Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Figuring out ChIP-seq enrichment utilizing MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1728–1740 (2012).
Google Scholar
Meers, M. P., Tenenbaum, D. & Henikoff, S. Peak calling by sparse enrichment evaluation for CUT&RUN chromatin profiling. Epigenetics Chromatin 12, 42 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weiner, A. et al. Co-ChIP permits genome-wide mapping of histone mark co-occurrence at single-molecule decision. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 953–961 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kinkley, S. et al. reChIP-seq reveals widespread bivalency of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in CD4+ reminiscence T cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 12514 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hu, S. S. et al. PATTY corrects open chromatin bias for improved bulk and single-cell CUT&Tag profiling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.02.673784 (2025).
Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Google Scholar
Seng, C. et al. WashU epigenome browser replace 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, W554–W561 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ramirez, F. et al. deepTools2: a subsequent technology internet server for deep-sequencing information evaluation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
Google Scholar
Engeholm, M. et al. Decision of transcription-induced hexasome-nucleosome complexes by Chd1 and FACT. Mol. Cell 84, 3423–3437.e8 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rao, S., Ahmad, Okay. & Ramachandran, S. Cooperative binding between distant transcription elements is a trademark of energetic enhancers. Mol. Cell 81, 1651–1665.e4 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rhee, H. S., Bataille, A. R., Zhang, L. & Pugh, B. F. Subnucleosomal buildings and nucleosome asymmetry throughout a genome. Cell 159, 1377–1388 (2014).
Google Scholar
He, Q., Johnston, J. & Zeitlinger, J. ChIP-nexus permits improved detection of in vivo transcription issue binding footprints. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 395–401 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wu, S. J. et al. Single-cell CUT&Tag evaluation of chromatin modifications in differentiation and tumor development. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 819–824 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gockel, J., Ramon-Zamorano, G., Kimmel, J., Spielmann, T. & Bartfai, R. CUT&Tag and DiBioCUT&Tag allow investigation of the AT-rich epigenome of Plasmodium falciparum from low-input samples. Cell Rep. Strategies 5, 101110 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, R., Grimm, S. A. & Wade, P. A. CUT&Tag-BS for simultaneous profiling of histone modification and DNA methylation with excessive effectivity and low price. Cell Rep. Strategies 1, 100118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zheng, Q. et al. Low-input CUT&Tag for environment friendly epigenomic profiling of zebrafish stage I oocytes. Entrance. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 1475912 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Chromatin and transcription issue profiling in uncommon stem cell populations utilizing CUT&Tag. STAR Protoc. 2, 100751 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ouyang, W. et al. Fast and low-input profiling of histone marks in crops utilizing nucleus CUT&Tag. Entrance. Plant Sci. 12, 634679 (2021).
Google Scholar
Susami, Okay., Ikeda, S., Hoshino, Y., Honda, S. & Minami, N. Genome-wide profiling of histone H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications in particular person blastocysts by CUT&Tag with out a strong help (NON-TiE-UP CUT&Tag). Sci. Rep. 12, 11727 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cardamone, F. et al. Chromatin panorama at cis-regulatory parts orchestrates cell destiny choices in early embryogenesis. Nat. Commun. 16, 3007 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription elements in advanced tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 825–835 (2021).
Google Scholar
Park, B. J. et al. CUT&Tag overcomes biases of ChIP and establishes chromatin patterns for repetitive genomic loci. iScience 28, 113757 (2025).
Google Scholar
Maurizio, I. et al. CUT&Tag reveals unconventional G-quadruplex panorama in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in response to oxidative stress. Nat. Commun. 16, 7253 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bartlett, D. A. et al. Excessive-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling by focused insertion of promoters (TIP-seq). J. Cell Biol. 220, e202103078 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zenk, F. et al. Single-cell epigenomic reconstruction of developmental trajectories from pluripotency in human neural organoid programs. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 1376–1386 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xiong, H., Wang, Q., Li, C. C. & He, A. Single-cell joint profiling of a number of epigenetic proteins and gene transcription. Sci. Adv. 10, eadi3664 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Combinatorial profiling of a number of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells utilizing scMTR-seq. Sci Adv 11, eadu3308 (2025).
Stuart, T. et al. Nanobody-tethered transposition permits multifactorial chromatin profiling at single-cell decision. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 806–812 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Okay. et al. Genomic profiling of native R loops with a DNA–RNA hybrid recognition sensor. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe3516 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Li, C. & Liang, Okay. Genome-wide native R-loop profiling by R-loop cleavage beneath targets and tagmentation (R-Loop CUT&Tag). Strategies Mol. Biol. 2528, 345–357 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. World coupling of R-loop dynamics with RNA polymerase II modulates gene expression and early growth of Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 13110–13127 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, T. et al. Genome-wide mapping of native co-localized G4s and R-loops in residing cells. eLife 13, RP99026 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hui, W. W. I., Simeone, A., Zyner, Okay. G., Tannahill, D. & Balasubramanian, S. Single-cell mapping of DNA G-quadruplex buildings in human most cancers cells. Sci. Rep. 11, 23641 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cui, Y. et al. Prediction of strand-specific and cell-type-specific G-quadruplexes based mostly on high-resolution CUT&Tag information. Temporary. Funct. Genomics 23, 265–275 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lyu, J., Shao, R., Kwong Yung, P. Y. & Elsasser, S. J. Genome-wide mapping of G-quadruplex buildings with CUT&Tag. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e13 (2022).
Google Scholar
Southall, T. D. et al. Cell-type-specific profiling of gene expression and chromatin binding with out cell isolation: assaying RNA Pol II occupancy in neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 26, 101–112 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hass, M. R. et al. SpDamID: marking DNA certain by protein complexes identifies notch-dimer responsive enhancers. Mol. Cell 59, 685–697 (2015).
Google Scholar
Aughey, G. N., Estacio Gomez, A., Thomson, J., Yin, H. & Southall, T. D. CATaDa reveals international remodelling of chromatin accessibility throughout stem cell differentiation in vivo. eLife 7, e32341 (2018).
Google Scholar
Guelen, L. et al. Area group of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).
Google Scholar
Ibarra, A., Benner, C., Tyagi, S., Cool, J. & Hetzer, M. W. Nucleoporin-mediated regulation of cell identification genes. Genes Dev. 30, 2253–2258 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kalverda, B., Pickersgill, H., Shloma, V. V. & Fornerod, M. Nucleoporins immediately stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes contained in the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360–371 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bersaglieri, C. et al. Genome-wide maps of nucleolus interactions reveal distinct layers of repressive chromatin domains. Nat. Commun. 13, 1483 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pickersgill, H. et al. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome on the nuclear lamina. Nat. Genet. 38, 1005–1014 (2006).
Google Scholar
Towbin, B. D. et al. Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin on the nuclear periphery. Cell 150, 934–947 (2012).
Google Scholar
Meuleman, W. et al. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are extremely conserved and related to A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270–280 (2013).
Google Scholar
Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Nuclear lamins will not be required for lamina-associated area group in mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO Rep. 16, 610–617 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lochs, S. J. A. & Sort, J. Simultaneous quantification of spatial genome positioning and transcriptomics in single cells with scDam&T-Seq. Strategies Mol. Biol. 2532, 215–241 (2022).
Google Scholar
Altemose, N. et al. muDamID: a microfluidic strategy for joint imaging and sequencing of protein–DNA interactions in single cells. Cell Syst. 11, 354–366.e9 (2020).
Google Scholar
de Luca, Okay. L. et al. Genome-wide profiling of DNA restore proteins in single cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 9918 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kefalopoulou, S. et al. Retrospective and multifactorial single-cell profiling reveals sequential chromatin reorganization throughout X inactivation. Nat. Cell Biol. 27, 1186–1198 (2025).
Google Scholar
van Schaik, T., Vos, M., Peric-Hupkes, D., Hn Celie, P. & van Steensel, B. Cell cycle dynamics of lamina-associated DNA. EMBO Rep. 21, e50636 (2020).
Altemose, N. et al. DiMeLo-seq: a long-read, single-molecule methodology for mapping protein–DNA interactions genome large. Nat. Strategies 19, 711–723 (2022). This examine mapped m6A chromatin accessibility and CpG DNA methylation at websites of particular chromatin epitopes utilizing long-read sequencing.
Google Scholar
Belmont, A. S. Nuclear compartments: an incomplete primer to nuclear compartments, our bodies, and genome group relative to nuclear structure. Chilly Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a041268 (2022).
Google Scholar
Quinodoz, S. A. & Guttman, M. Important roles for RNA in shaping nuclear group. Chilly Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a039719 (2022).
Google Scholar
Herzog, V. A. et al. Thiol-linked alkylation of RNA to evaluate expression dynamics. Nat. Strategies 14, 1198–1204 (2017).
Google Scholar
Neumann, T. et al. Quantification of experimentally induced nucleotide conversions in high-throughput sequencing datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 258 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vock, I. W. & Simon, M. D. bakR: uncovering differential RNA synthesis and degradation kinetics transcriptome-wide with Bayesian hierarchical modeling. RNA 29, 958–976 (2023).
Google Scholar
Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J. G., Kaya-Okur, H. S. & Ahmad, Okay. Environment friendly chromatin accessibility mapping in situ by nucleosome-tethered tagmentation. eLife 9, e63274 (2020).
Google Scholar
Van den Berge, Okay. et al. Normalization benchmark of ATAC-seq datasets exhibits the significance of accounting for GC-content results. Cell Rep. Strategies 2, 100321 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhan, Y., Grabbe, F., Oberbeckmann, E., Dienemann, C. & Cramer, P. Three-step mechanism of promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 84, 1699–1710.e6 (2024).
Google Scholar
Moore, J. E. et al. An expanded registry of candidate cis-regulatory parts. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09909-9 (2026).
Google Scholar
Henikoff, S. et al. Epigenomic evaluation of Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples by CUT&Tag. Nat. Commun. 14, 5930 (2023). This examine launched in situ epigenomic profiling for traditional mounted archival samples.
Google Scholar
Henikoff, S. et al. RNA polymerase II at histone genes predicts consequence in human most cancers. Science 387, 737–743 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Henikoff, S. & Ahmad, Okay. Chromatin profiling for everybody: FFPE-CUTAC for the idea and apply of recent molecular biology. Entrance. Epigenet. Epigenom. https://doi.org/10.3389/freae.2025.1753710 (2026).
Sort, J. et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome–nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153, 178–192 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zeller, P. et al. Single-cell sortChIC identifies hierarchical chromatin dynamics throughout hematopoiesis. Nat. Genet. 55, 333–345 (2023).
Google Scholar
Eldred, Okay. C. et al. CUT&TIME captures the historical past of open chromatin in creating neurons. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.29.673195 (2025). This examine described m6 A-based chromatin accessibility mapping adopted by CUT&Tag for mapping gene regulation modifications throughout retinal growth in human organoids.
Takei, Y. et al. Genome-wide chromatin recording resolves dynamic cell state modifications. Preprint at biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.05.668773 (2025). This examine described m6A-based chromatin accessibility mapping adopted by CUT&Tag for mapping gene regulation modifications throughout differentiation in mammalian cells.
Kawamura, Y. Okay., Khalil, V. & Kitazawa, T. Complete-genome single-cell multimodal historical past tracing to disclose cell identification transition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.669973v1 (2025). This examine described single-cell DamID adopted by Gm6ATC-recognition mapping for following the historical past of chromatin modifications within the mouse mind in vivo.
Wang, H., Johnston, M. & Mitra, R. D. Calling playing cards for DNA-binding proteins. Genome Res. 17, 1202–1209 (2007). This examine launched transposase-based epigenomic profiling.
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Mayhew, D., Chen, X., Johnston, M. & Mitra, R. D. “Calling playing cards” for DNA-binding proteins in mammalian cells. Genetics 190, 941–949 (2012).
Google Scholar
Moudgil, A. et al. Self-reporting transposons allow simultaneous readout of gene expression and transcription issue binding in single cells. Cell 182, 992–1008.e21 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sarafinovska, S. et al. Inducible calling playing cards: creating mouse reagents for experimentally managed transposon insertion in vivo. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.04.685928 (2025).
Zhang, B. et al. Characterizing mobile heterogeneity in chromatin state with scCUT&Tag-pro. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1220–1230 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, C. et al. Joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse mind. Nat. Strategies 18, 283–292 (2021).
Google Scholar
Geisenberger, C. et al. Single-cell multi-omic detection of DNA methylation and histone modifications reconstructs the dynamics of epigenomic upkeep. Nat. Strategies 22, 2042–2051 (2025).
Google Scholar
Janssens, D. H. et al. Scalable single-cell profiling of chromatin modifications with sciCUT&Tag. Nat. Protoc. 19, 83–112 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hainer, S. J., Boskovic, A., McCannell, Okay. N., Rando, O. J. & Fazzio, T. G. Profiling of pluripotency elements in single cell early embryos. Cell 177, 1319–1329.e11 (2019).
Google Scholar
Farzad, N. et al. Spatially resolved epigenome sequencing through Tn5 transposition and deterministic DNA barcoding in tissue. Nat. Protoc. 19, 3389–3425 (2024).
Google Scholar
Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling on the mobile degree. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). This examine launched Spatial-CUT&Tag utilizing dBIT microfluidics expertise.
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. Spatially resolved genome-wide joint profiling of epigenome and transcriptome with spatial-ATAC-RNA-seq and spatial-CUT&Tag-RNA-seq. Nat. Protoc. 20, 2383–2417 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D. et al. Spatial epigenome-transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues. Nature 616, 113–122 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mendoza-Ferri, M. G. et al. Tissular chromatin-state cartography based mostly on double-barcoded DNA arrays that seize unloaded PA-Tn5 transposase. Genome Res. 35, 1633–1645 (2025).
Google Scholar
Meers, M. P., Bryson, T. D., Henikoff, J. G. & Henikoff, S. Improved CUT&RUN chromatin profiling instruments. eLife 8, e46314 (2019).
Google Scholar
Patel, L. A., Cao, Y., Mendenhall, E. M., Benner, C. & Goren, A. The Wild West of spike-in normalization. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1343–1349 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tryka, Okay. A. et al. NCBI’s Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D975–D979 (2014).
Google Scholar
Freeberg, M. A. et al. The European Genome-phenome Archive in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D980–D987 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bai, H., Lin, M., Meng, Y., Bai, H. & Cai, S. An improved CUT&RUN methodology for regulation community reconstruction of low abundance transcription issue. Cell. Sign. 96, 110361 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sort, J. et al. Genome-wide maps of nuclear lamina interactions in single human cells. Cell 163, 134–147 (2015). This examine launched single-cell chromatin profiling utilizing DamID.
Google Scholar
Corridor, L. L. & Lawrence, J. B. XIST RNA and structure of the inactive X chromosome: implications for the repeat genome. Chilly Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 345–356 (2010).
Google Scholar
Korn, C. et al. Interplay of DNA fragmentation issue (DFF) with DNA reveals an unprecedented mechanism for nuclease inhibition and means that DFF might be activated in a DNA-bound state. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 6005–6015 (2005).
Google Scholar
Spector, B. M., Santana, J. F., Pufall, M. A. & Worth, D. H. DFF-ChIP: a way to detect and quantify advanced interactions between RNA polymerase II, transcription elements, and chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, e88 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential recognized by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. Cell 183, 1103–1116.e20 (2020).
Google Scholar
Glinos, D. A. et al. Transcriptome variation in human tissues revealed by long-read sequencing. Nature 608, 353–359 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gamarra, N. et al. DiMeLo-cito: a one-tube protocol for mapping protein–DNA interactions reveals CTCF bookmarking in mitosis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.11.642717 (2025).
Zhang, D. et al. Spatial dynamics of mind growth and neuroinflammation. Nature 647, 213–227 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lu, T., Ang, C. E. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in advanced tissues. Cell 185, 4448–4464.e17 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, M. et al. Tremendous-CUT&Tag: a delicate, spatially resolved strategy for epigenomic profiling in tissue sections. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.08.692886 (2025).
Liao, H. et al. Optics-free reconstruction of shapes, photographs and volumes with DNA barcode proximity graphs. eLife 15, RP110436 (2026).
Bohaczuk, S. C. et al. Resolving the chromatin impression of mosaic variants with focused Fiber-seq. Genome Res. 34, 2269–2278 (2024).
Google Scholar
Abdulhay, N. J. et al. Massively multiplex single-molecule oligonucleosome footprinting. eLife 9, e59404 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sati, S. et al. HiCuT: an environment friendly and low enter methodology to determine protein-directed chromatin interactions. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010121 (2022).
Google Scholar
Qi, X. et al. Hello-Tag: a easy and environment friendly methodology for figuring out protein-mediated long-range chromatin interactions with low cell numbers. Sci. China Life Sci. 67, 1027–1034 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dekker, J. et al. An built-in view of the construction and performance of the human 4D nucleome. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09890-3 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zentner, G. E., Kasinathan, S., Xin, B., Rohs, R. & Henikoff, S. ChEC-seq kinetics discriminate transcription issue binding websites by DNA sequence and form in vivo. Nat. Commun. 6, 8733 (2015).
Google Scholar
Henikoff, S. & Xu, Y. CUTAC for FFPE slides. Protocols.io https://www.protocols.io/view/cutac-for-ffpe-slides-g7scbznax (2025).
Kaya-Okur, H. S. & Henikoff, S. Bench high CUT&Tag. Protocols.io https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bcuhiwt6 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ku, W. L. et al. Single-cell chromatin immunocleavage sequencing (scChIC-seq) to profile histone modification. Nat. Strategies 16, 323–325 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kefalopoulou, S. scDam&T-seq. Protocols.io https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q26g75878lwz/v1 (2025).
Google Scholar
Khyzha, N. RT&Tag (reverse transcribe & tagment). Protocols.io https://www.protocols.io/view/rt-amp-tag-reverse-transcribe-amp-tagment-x54v9jyjqg3e/v1 (2022).
Liu, M. et al. Genome-coverage single-cell histone modifications for embryo lineage tracing. Nature 640, 828–839 (2025). This examine described multifactorial single-cell in situ chromatin profiling following mouse embryonic growth starting on the two-cell stage.
Google Scholar
Kefalopoulou, S. & Zeller, P. Dam&ChIC. Protocols.io https://www.protocols.io/view/dam-amp-chic-261gee4njg47/v1 (2025).
Ward, C. M., To, T. H. & Pederson, S. M. ngsReports: a Bioconductor package deal for managing FastQC stories and different NGS associated log recordsdata. Bioinformatics 36, 2587–2588 (2020).
Google Scholar
Langdon, W. B. Efficiency of genetic programming optimised Bowtie2 on genome comparability and analytic testing (GCAT) benchmarks. BioData Min. 8, 1 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Google Scholar
Neumann, T. & Rescheneder, P. Streamlining SLAMseq evaluation with ultra-high sensitivity. GitHub https://t-neumann.github.io/slamdunk/ (2025).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq information with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Google Scholar
Panda, A. et al. Genome-wide evaluation and visualization of copy quantity with CNVpytor in igv.js. Bioinformatics 40, btae453 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, L., Wang, S. & Li, W. RSeQC: high quality management of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 2184–2185 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q. et al. Exploring epigenomic datasets by ChIPseeker. Curr. Protoc. 2, e585 (2022).
Google Scholar
Okonechnikov, Okay., Conesa, A. & Garcia-Alcalde, F. Qualimap 2: superior multi-sample high quality management for high-throughput sequencing information. Bioinformatics 32, 292–294 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bailey, T. L., Johnson, J., Grant, C. E. & Noble, W. S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W39–W49 (2015).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10 (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Q., Liu, N., Orkin, S. H. & Yuan, G. CUT&RUNTools: a versatile pipeline for CUT&RUN processing and footprint evaluation. Genome Biol. 20, 192 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, F., Sankaran, V. G. & Yuan, G.-C. CUT&RUNTools 2.0: a pipeline for single-cell and bulk-level CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag information evaluation. Bioinformatics 38, 252–254 (2022).
Google Scholar
Institute, B. Picard toolkit. GitHub https://github.com/broadinstitute/picard (2019).
Consortium, E. P. et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA parts within the human and mouse genomes. Nature 583, 699–710 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yeung, J. et al. scChIX-seq infers dynamic relationships between histone modifications in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 813–823 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barcenas-Partitions, J. R. et al. Nano-CUT&Tag for multimodal chromatin profiling at single-cell decision. Nat. Protoc. 19, 791–830 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pleiner, T., Bates, M. & Gorlich, D. A toolbox of anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG secondary nanobodies. J. Cell Biol. 217, 1143–1154 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Af-CUT&Tag: a delicate and antibody-free chromatin profiling methodology utilizing genetically encoded tags and high-affinity binders fused to Tn5. Nat. Commun. 17, 1746 (2026).
Google Scholar
Cao, J. et al. Complete single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cusanovich, D. A. et al. A single-cell atlas of in vivo mammalian chromatin accessibility. Cell 174, 1309–1324.e18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Regev, A. et al. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27041 (2017).
Tabula Muris, C. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Nanobody-tethered transposition for twin profiling of histone modification and DNA methylation. JACS Au 6, 543–553 (2026).
Google Scholar
Hao, Y. et al. Built-in evaluation of multimodal single-cell information. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021).
Google Scholar
Markodimitraki, C. M. et al. Simultaneous quantification of protein–DNA interactions and transcriptomes in single cells with scDam&T-seq. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1922–1953 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rooijers, Okay. et al. Simultaneous quantification of protein–DNA contacts and transcriptomes in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 766–772 (2019).
Google Scholar
Argelaguet, R. et al. MOFA+: a statistical framework for complete integration of multi-modal single-cell information. Genome Biol. 21, 111 (2020).
Google Scholar
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic information throughout completely different situations, applied sciences, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gayoso, A. et al. Joint probabilistic modeling of single-cell multi-omic information with totalVI. Nat. Strategies 18, 272–282 (2021).
Google Scholar
![[2603.24747] Formal Semantics for Agentic Instrument Protocols: A Course of Calculus Method](http://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png "[2603.24747] Formal Semantics for Agentic Instrument Protocols: A Course of Calculus Method"){kind=logo}
