Lowe, J. S. & Anderson, P. G. Stevens & Lowe’s Human Histology 4th edn (Elsevier, 2015).
Keren, L. et al. MIBI-TOF: a multiplexed imaging platform relates mobile phenotypes and tissue construction. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax5851 (2019).
Google Scholar
Goltsev, Y. et al. Deep profiling of mouse splenic structure with CODEX multiplexed imaging. Cell 174, 968–981 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gerdes, M. J. et al. Extremely multiplexed single-cell evaluation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded most cancers tissue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11982–11987 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tsujikawa, T. et al. Quantitative multiplex immunohistochemistry reveals myeloid-inflamed tumor-immune complexity related to poor prognosis. Cell Rep. 19, 203–217 (2017).
Google Scholar
Saka, S. Ok. et al. Immuno-SABER allows extremely multiplexed and amplified protein imaging in tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1080–1090 (2019).
Google Scholar
Giesen, C. et al. Extremely multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular decision by mass cytometry. Nat. Strategies 11, 417–422 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lin, R. et al. A hybridization-chain-reaction-based technique for amplifying immunosignals. Nat. Strategies 15, 275–278 (2018).
Google Scholar
Radtke, A. J. et al. IBEX: a flexible multiplex optical imaging strategy for deep phenotyping and spatial evaluation of cells in advanced tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33455–33465 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kinkhabwala, A. et al. MACSima imaging cyclic staining (MICS) expertise reveals combinatorial goal pairs for CAR T cell remedy of strong tumors. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–16 (2022).
Google Scholar
Intestine, G., Herrmann, M. D. & Pelkmans, L. Multiplexed protein maps hyperlink subcellular group to mobile states. Science 361, eaar7042 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Fast sequential in situ multiplexing with DNA change imaging in neuronal cells and tissues. Nano Lett. 17, 6131–6139 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schubert, W. et al. Analyzing proteome topology and performance by automated multidimensional fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1270–1278 (2006).
Google Scholar
Berry, S. et al. Evaluation of multispectral imaging with the AstroPath platform informs efficacy of PD-1 blockade. Science 372, eaba2609 (2021).
Google Scholar
Levine, J. H. et al. Knowledge-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162, 184–197 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schürch, C. M. et al. Coordinated mobile neighborhoods orchestrate antitumoral immunity on the colorectal most cancers invasive entrance. Cell 182, 1341–1359 (2020).
Google Scholar
Keren, L. et al. A structured tumor-immune microenvironment in triple detrimental breast most cancers revealed by multiplexed ion beam imaging. Cell 174, 1373–1387 (2018).
Google Scholar
Stuart, T. et al. Complete integration of single-cell information. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: open supply software program for digital pathology picture evaluation. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schapiro, D. et al. histoCAT: evaluation of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex picture cytometry information. Nat. Strategies 14, 873–876 (2017).
Google Scholar
Van Gassen, S. et al. FlowSOM: utilizing self-organizing maps for visualization and interpretation of cytometry information. Cytometry A 87, 636–645 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schapiro, D. et al. MCMICRO: a scalable, modular image-processing pipeline for multiplexed tissue imaging. Nat. Strategies 19, 311–315 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yapp, C. et al. Extremely multiplexed 3D profiling of cell states and immune niches in human tumors. Nat. Strategies 22, 2180–2193 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bai, Y. et al. Adjoining cell marker lateral spillover compensation and reinforcement for multiplexed photographs. Entrance. Immunol. 12, 652631 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, C. C. et al. Strong phenotyping of extremely multiplexed tissue imaging information utilizing pixel-level clustering. Nat. Commun. 14, 4618 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. Identification of cell varieties in multiplexed in situ photographs by combining protein expression and spatial info utilizing CELESTA. Nat. Strategies 19, 759–769 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brbić, M. et al. Annotation of spatially resolved single-cell information with STELLAR. Nat. Strategies 19, 1411–1418 (2022).
Google Scholar
Amitay, Y. et al. CellSighter: a neural community to categorise cells in extremely multiplexed photographs. Nat. Commun. 14, 4302 (2023).
Google Scholar
Markovits, E. et al. A novel deep studying pipeline for cell typing and phenotypic marker quantification in multiplex imaging. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.09.515776 (2022).
Geuenich, M. J. et al. Automated project of cell identification from single-cell multiplexed imaging and proteomic information. Cell Syst. 12, 1173–1186 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shaban, M. et al. MAPS: pathologist-level cell kind annotation from tissue photographs by means of machine studying. Nat. Commun. 15, 28 (2024).
Google Scholar
Solorzano, L. et al. Machine studying for cell classification and neighborhood evaluation in glioma tissue. Cytometry A 99, 1176–1186 (2021).
Google Scholar
Greenwald, N. F. et al. Entire-cell segmentation of tissue photographs with human-level efficiency utilizing large-scale information annotation and deep studying. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 555–565 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for mobile segmentation. Nat. Strategies 18, 100–106 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Weigert, M., Broaddus, C. & Myers, G. Cell detection with star-convex polygons. In Proc. twenty first Convention on Medical Picture Computing and Laptop Assisted Intervention (eds Frangi, A. F. et al.) (Springer, 2018).
Kirillov, A. et al. Phase something. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Worldwide Convention on Laptop Imaginative and prescient (ed. Ceballos, C.) (2023).
Chiu, C.-L. & Clack, N. Napari: a Python multi-dimensional picture viewer platform for the analysis neighborhood. Microsc. Microanal. 28, 1576–1577 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jessup, J. et al. Scope2Screen: focus+context strategies for pathology tumor evaluation in multivariate picture information. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 28, 259–269 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. J. et al. Generalized cell phenotyping for spatial proteomics with language-informed imaginative and prescient fashions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.02.621624 (2024).
Rumberger, J. L. et al. Automated classification of mobile expression in multiplexed imaging information with Nimbus. Nat. Strategies 22, 2161–2170 (2025).
Google Scholar
Spitzer, M. H. et al. An interactive reference framework for modeling a dynamic immune system. Science 349, 1259425 (2015).
Google Scholar
Seung, H. S., Opper, M. & Sompolinsky, H. Question by committee. In Proc. fifth Annual Workshop On Computational Studying Idea (ed. Haussler, D.) (ACM, 1992).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. twenty second ACM SIGKDD Worldwide Convention on Information Discovery and Knowledge Mining (eds Krishnapuram, B. & Shah, M.) (ACM, 2016).
Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V. & Gulin, A. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical options. In Proc. thirty second Worldwide Convention on Neural Info Processing Programs (eds Bengio, S., Wallach, H. M., Larochelle, H., Grauman, Ok. & Cesa-Bianchi, N.) (Curran Assoc., 2018).
Azulay, N. et al. A spatial atlas of human gastrointestinal acute GVHD reveals epithelial and immune dynamics underlying illness pathophysiology. Sci. Transl. Med. 17, eadu6032 (2025).
Google Scholar
de Saint-Vis, B. et al. A novel lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein, DC-LAMP, induced upon DC maturation, is transiently expressed in MHC class II compartment. Immunity 9, 325–336 (1998).
Google Scholar
Salaun, B. et al. CD208/dendritic cell-lysosomal related membrane protein is a marker of regular and reworked kind II pneumocytes. Am. J. Pathol. 164, 861–871 (2004).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. Modifications of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ and CD8+CD28− regulatory T cells in non-small cell lung most cancers sufferers present process surgical procedure. Int. Immunopharmacol. 18, 255–261 (2014).
Google Scholar
Korosec, P. et al. Growth of pulmonary CD8+CD56+ pure killer T-cells in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 132, 1291–1297 (2007).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified strategy to decoding mannequin predictions. In Proc. thirty first Worldwide Convention on Neural Info Processing Programs (eds von Luxburg, U. et al.) (Curran Assoc., 2017).
Goldsborough, T. et al. A novel channel invariant structure for the segmentation of cells and nuclei in multiplexed photographs utilizing InstanSeg. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.611150 (2024).
Berg, S. et al. Ilastik: interactive machine studying for (bio) picture evaluation. Nat. Strategies 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
Google Scholar
Piccinini, F. et al. Superior cell classifier: user-friendly machine-learning-based software program for locating phenotypes in high-content imaging information. Cell Syst. 4, 651–655 (2017).
Google Scholar
Butler, P. W. V., Hafizi, R. & Day, G. M. Machine-learned potentials by lively studying from natural crystal construction prediction landscapes. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 945–957 (2024).
Google Scholar
Frasca, M., Sepehri, M., Petrini, A., Grossi, G. & Valentini, G. Committee-based lively studying to pick out detrimental examples for predicting protein capabilities. In Proc. fifteenth Worldwide Assembly on Computational Intelligence Strategies for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics (eds Raposo, M. et al.) (Springer, 2020).
Romberg, J. & Escher, T. Automated subject categorisation of residents’ contributions: decreasing handbook labelling efforts by means of lively studying. In Proc. twenty first Worldwide Convention on Digital Authorities (eds Janssen, M. et al.) (Springer, 2022).
Jiang, X. et al. A novel digital nostril studying method based mostly on lively studying: EQBC-RBFNN. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 249, 533–541 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schiemann, R., Gherardini, P. F., Kageyama, R., Travers, M. & Kitch, L. Mantis Viewer. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4909620 (2020).
Pang, M., Roy, T. Ok., Wu, X. & Tan, Ok. CelloType: a unified mannequin for segmentation and classification of tissue photographs. Nat. Strategies 22, 348–357 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ben-Uri, R. et al. Excessive-dimensional imaging utilizing combinatorial channel multiplexing and deep studying. Nat. Biotechnol. 44, 233–246 (2026).
Google Scholar
Baranski, A. et al. MAUI (MBI evaluation consumer interface)—a picture processing pipeline for multiplexed mass based mostly imaging. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008887 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lu, P. et al. IMC-Denoise: a content material conscious denoising pipeline to boost imaging mass cytometry. Nat. Commun. 14, 1601 (2023).
Google Scholar
Desmoulière, A. & Gabbiani, G. Clean muscle cell and fibroblast organic and practical options: similarities and variations. In The Vascular Clean Muscle Cell (eds Schwartz, S. M. & Mecham, R. P.) (Elsevier, 1995).
Shwartz-Ziv, R. & Armon, A. Tabular information: deep studying shouldn’t be all you want. Inform. Fusion 81, 84–90 (2022).
Google Scholar
Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E. & Varoquaux, G. Why do tree-based fashions nonetheless outperform deep studying on typical tabular information? In Proc. thirty sixth Worldwide Convention on Neural Info Processing Programs (eds Koyejo, S. et al.) (Curran Assoc., 2022).
Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an crucial model, high-performance deep studying library. In Proc. thirty third Worldwide Convention on Neural Info Processing Programs (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) (Curran Assoc., 2019).
Vesanto, J. & Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 586–600 (2000).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. A comparability framework and guideline of clustering strategies for mass cytometry information. Genome Biol. 20, 1–18 (2019).
Google Scholar
Barrett, P., Hunter, J., Miller, J. T., Hsu, J.-C. & Greenfield, P. matplotlib–a transportable Python plotting bundle. In Proce. Astronomical Knowledge Evaluation Software program and Programs XIV Convention (eds Shopbell, P. et al.) (ASP, 2005).
Waskom, M. L. Seaborn: statistical information visualization. J. Open Supply Softw. 6, 3021 (2021).
Google Scholar
Perkel, J. M. The software program that powers scientific illustration. Nature 582, 137–139 (2020).
Google Scholar
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: elementary algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Strategies 17, 261–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Summerfield, M. Fast GUI Programming with Python and Qt: The Definitive Information to PyQt Programming (Prentice Corridor Press, 2015).
Bradski, G. The opencv library. Dr. Dobb’s J. 25, 120–123 (2000).
Van der Walt, S. et al. scikit-image: picture processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).
Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).
Google Scholar
McKinney, W. pandas: a foundational Python library for information evaluation and statistics. Python Excessive Carry out. Sci. Comput. 14, 1–9 (2011).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine studying in Python. J. Mach. Study. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: a extremely environment friendly gradient boosting determination tree. In Proc. thirty first Worldwide Convention on Neural Info Processing Programs (eds von Luxburg, U. et al.) (Curran Assoc., 2017).
Copeland, R. Important SQLAlchemy (O’Reilly Media, 2008).
Bussi, Y., Shainshein, D., Ovits, E. & Keren, L. CellTune: an integrative software program for correct cell classification in spatial proteomics [code]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19453419 (2026).
