Hossain, M. E., Shahrukh, S. & Hossain, S. A. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides: impacts on soil degradation, groundwater, and human well being in Bangladesh. in Environmental Degradation: Challenges and Methods for Mitigation (eds. Singh, V. P., Yadav, S., Yadav, Ok. Ok. & Yadava, R. N.) 63–92 (Springer Worldwide Publishing, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95542-7_4
Krasilnikov, P. & Taboada, M. A. Amanullah. Fertilizer use, soil well being and agricultural sustainability. Agriculture 12, 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040462 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nadarajan, S. & Sukumaran, S. Chemistry and toxicology behind chemical fertilizers. in Managed Launch Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture 195–229 (Elsevier, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819555-0.00012-1
Geisseler, D. & Scow, Ok. M. Lengthy-term results of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms – A evaluation. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 75, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.023 (2014).
Google Scholar
Verma, R. C. et al. A evaluation of long-term results of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms. IJPSS 35, 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i203912 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bouhzam, I. et al. Assessing environmental impacts of assorted biofertilizers in Europe: a step towards round economic system transition. Maintain. Prod. Consum. 39, 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.012 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mazurenko, B. et al. Biostimulants-induced enhancements in pea-barley intercropping techniques: a examine of biomass and yield optimization below Ukrainian weather conditions. J. Agric. Meals Res. 22, 102074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102074 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kurniawati, A., Toth, G., Ylivainio, Ok. & Toth, Z. Alternatives and challenges of bio-based fertilizers utilization for bettering soil well being. Org. Agr. 13, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00432-7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sani, M. N. H. et al. Harnessing biostimulants from biogas digestates for high-value useful resource restoration: a evaluation. Environ. Chem. Lett. 23, 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01801-8 (2025).
Google Scholar
Priya, A. Ok., Alagumalai, A., Balaji, D. & Track, H. Bio-based agricultural merchandise: a sustainable various to agrochemicals for selling a round economic system. RSC Maintain. 1, 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SU00075C (2023).
Google Scholar
Soni, S. Ok. & Soni, R. Nutrient restoration and soil enrichment: sustainable practices for useful resource recycling. Inexperienced. Biorefinery Options 209–248 (Springer Nature Singapore, 2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9013-8_7
Ghorbani, M. Recycled nitrogen for regenerative agriculture: a evaluation of agronomic and environmental impacts of round nutrient sources. Agronomy 15, 2503. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112503 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Synchronized fertilization based mostly on crop nutrient uptake and fertilizer nutrient launch traits will increase nutrient use effectivity in banana. Sci. Rep. 15, 34449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17602-0 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kebede, E. Contribution, utilization, and enchancment of legumes-driven organic nitrogen fixation in agricultural techniques. Entrance. Maintain. Meals Syst. 5, 767998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.767998 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pandey, R., Vengavasi, Ok. & Hawkesford, M. J. Plant adaptation to nutrient stress. Plant. Physiol. Rep. 26, 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-2021-00636-7 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rao, M. J. et al. Antioxidant protection system in crops: reactive oxygen species manufacturing, signaling, and scavenging throughout abiotic stress-induced oxidative injury. Horticulturae 11, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11050477 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sani, M. N. H. & Yong, J. W. H. Harnessing synergistic biostimulatory processes: a believable method for enhanced crop development and resilience in natural farming. Biology 11, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010041 (2021).
Google Scholar
Matthews, S., Siddiqui, Y. & Ali, A. Unleashing the facility of bio-stimulants for enhanced crop development, productiveness, and high quality: a complete evaluation. J. Plant. Nutr. 48, 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2412736 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bolan, S. et al. The potential of biochar as a microbial provider for agricultural and environmental purposes. Sci. Complete Environ. 886, 163968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163968 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sani, M. N. H. et al. Waste-derived nanobiochar: a brand new avenue in the direction of sustainable agriculture, atmosphere, and round bioeconomy. Sci. Complete Environ. 905, 166881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166881 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, A. et al. Deciphering the microbiome potential and metabolic profiling of animal waste co-composting reveals the co-occurrence community of non-microbial and microbial biostimulants to strengthen conservative practices in sustainable agriculture. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 12, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-025-00765-3 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jmaili, Ok. et al. Non-microbial biostimulants for plant development and abiotic stress mitigation: a evaluation of latest scientific improvements. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 82, 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2025.2457867 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sani, M. N. H., Islam, M. N., Uddain, J., Chowdhury, M. S. N. & Subramaniam, S. Synergistic impact of microbial and nonmicrobial biostimulants on development, yield, and dietary high quality of natural tomato. Crop Sci. 60, 2102–2114. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20176 (2020).
Google Scholar
Al-Demrdash, H. S. et al. Enhancing drought tolerance in faba bean utilizing ascorbic and humic acids: position of antioxidant enzymes and appropriate solutes. BMC Plant. Biol. 25, 1027. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06971-3 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nabi, F. et al. Construction-based operate of humic acid in abiotic stress alleviation in crops: a evaluation. Crops 14, (1916). (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14131916
Pérez-Montaño, F. et al. Rising crops and plant growth-promoting micro organism (PGPB): a synergistic method to climate-resilient agriculture. Microbiome 13, 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02225-4 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sahoo, A. et al. Omics-driven insights into plant growth-promoting microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Discov Maintain. 6, 659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01582-2 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. Y. et al. A evaluation of the regulatory position of plant development–selling rhizobacteria in alfalfa below stress circumstances. Crops 14, 3248. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213248 (2025).
Google Scholar
Sani, M. N. H., Hasan, M., Uddain, J. & Subramaniam, S. Impression of software of Trichoderma and biochar on development, productiveness and dietary high quality of tomato below decreased N-P-Ok fertilization. Ann. Agric. Sci. 65, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2020.06.003 (2020).
Google Scholar
Deng, Z. et al. Biochar-based Bacillus subtilis inoculants promote plant development: regulating microbial neighborhood to enhance soil properties. J. Environ. Handle. 373, 123534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123534 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rupngam, T., Udomkun, P., Boonupara, T. & Kaewlom, P. Soil–plant biochemical interactions below agricultural byproduct amendments and potassium humate: enhancing soil operate and bioactive compounds in sunflower sprouts. Agronomy 15, 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071651 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, B. et al. Synergistic mechanisms of biochar and microorganisms in soil remediation: from heavy steel immobilization to sustainable agriculture. Int. J. Environ. Res. 20, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-025-00959-5 (2026).
Google Scholar
Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S., Tamilselvi, S. & Saravanan, A. Formulation and combinatorial impact of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus coagulans as biocontrol brokers. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 30, 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101868 (2020).
Google Scholar
De Freitas, C. G. et al. Inoculation with azospirillum brasilense and bacillus amyloliquefaciens enhances tomato resilience to extreme water deficit: A complete morpho-physiological and biochemical evaluation. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 18 (3), e70316. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70316 (2026).
Google Scholar
Hossain, M. M. et al. Physiological attributes of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) influenced by totally different sources of vitamins (NPK) in Madhupur tract area of Bangladesh. J. Sci. Technol. Environ. Inf. 11, 736–748. https://doi.org/10.18801/jstei.110121.74 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mmotla, Ok. et al. Exploring the intricacies of plant development selling rhizobacteria interactions: an omics evaluation. Ann. Microbiol. 75, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-025-01793-y (2025).
Google Scholar
Guo, H., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y. & Lu, H. Results of biochar on plant development and hydro-chemical properties of recycled concrete combination. Sci. Complete Environ. 882, 163557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163557 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barrs, H. & Weatherley, P. A re-examination of the relative turgidity approach for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J. Biol. Sci. 15, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413 (1962).
Google Scholar
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. Fast willpower of free proline for water-stress research. Plant. Soil. 39, 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060 (1973).
Google Scholar
Arnon, D. I. Copper enzymes in remoted chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant. Physiol. 24, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 (1949).
Google Scholar
Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in remoted chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1 (1968).
Google Scholar
Yu, C. W., Murphy, T. M. & Lin, C. H. Hydrogen peroxide-induced chilling tolerance in mung beans mediated by means of ABA-independent glutathione accumulation. Funct. Plant. Biol. 30, 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03091 (2003).
Google Scholar
Dionisio-Sese, M. L. & Tobita, S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant. Sci. 135, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9 (1998).
Google Scholar
Olgun, F. A. O. et al. Folin–Ciocalteu spectrophotometric assay of ascorbic acid in pharmaceutical tablets and orange juice with pH adjustment and pre-extraction of lanthanum (III)–flavonoid complexes. J. Sci. Meals Agric. 94, 2401–2408. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6569 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chowdhury, M. S. N., Sani, M. N. H., Siddique, A. B., Hossain, M. S. & Yong, J. W. H. Synergistic results of biochar and potassium co-application on development, physiological attributes, and antioxidant protection mechanisms of wheat below water deficit circumstances. Plant. Stress. 12, 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100452 (2024).
Google Scholar
Khalid, F. et al. Plant biostimulants: mechanisms and purposes for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses. J. Soil Sci. Plant. Nutr. 24, 6641–6690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01996-3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, L., Tan, Z., Gong, H. & Huang, Q. Migration and transformation mechanisms of nutrient components (N, P, Ok) inside biochar in straw–biochar–soil–plant techniques: a evaluation. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04253 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hossain, M. Z. et al. Biochar and its significance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant. Biochar 2, 379–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z (2020).
Google Scholar
Pattnaik, S., Mohapatra, B. & Gupta, A. Plant growth-promoting microbe mediated uptake of important vitamins (Fe, P, Ok) for crop stress administration: microbe–soil–plant continuum. Entrance. Agron. 3, 689972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.689972 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wahab, A. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria biochemical pathways and their environmental impression: a evaluation of sustainable farming practices. Plant. Progress Regul. 104, 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-024-01218-x (2024).
Google Scholar
Tao, J. et al. The excellent results of biochar amendments on soil natural carbon accumulation, soil acidification amelioration and heavy steel availability within the soil–rice system. Agronomy 14, 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112498 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rathinapriya, P. et al. Unlocking biochar impacts on abiotic stress dynamics: a scientific evaluation of soil high quality and crop enchancment. Entrance. Plant. Sci. 15, 1479925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1479925 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rahim, H. U., Allevato, E., Vaccari, F. P. & Stazi, S. R. Biochar aged or mixed with humic substances: fabrication and implications for sustainable agriculture and environment-a evaluation. J. Soils Sediments. 24, 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03644-2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Maffia, A. et al. Humic substances: bridging ecology and agriculture for a greener future. Agronomy 15, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020410 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rathor, P., Gorim, L. Y. & Thilakarathna, M. S. Plant physiological and molecular responses triggered by humic based mostly biostimulants – a means ahead to sustainable agriculture. Plant. Soil. 492, 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06156-7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhu, X. et al. Biochar alters the morphology of plant roots to allow optimized and decreased nitrogen fertilizer purposes. Plant. Soil. 492, 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06154-9 (2023).
Google Scholar
Flores-Duarte, N. J. et al. Position of nodulation-enhancing rhizobacteria within the promotion of Medicago sativa improvement in nutrient-poor soils. Crops 11, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091164 (2022).
Google Scholar
Etesami, H. & Adl, S. M. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and their motion mechanisms in availability of vitamins to crops. in Phyto-Microbiome in Stress Regulation (eds. Kumar, M., Kumar, V. & Prasad, R.) 147–203 (Springer Singapore, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2576-6_9
Remans, R. et al. Physiological and genetic evaluation of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting micro organism in widespread bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Plant. Soil. 302, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9462-7 (2008).
Google Scholar
Vardharajula, S. et al. Drought-tolerant plant development selling Bacillus spp.: impact on development, osmolytes, and antioxidant standing of maize below drought stress. J. Plant. Work together. 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2010.535178 (2011).
Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. How does biochar affect soil N cycle? A meta-analysis. Plant. Soil. 426, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3619-4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Results of biochar software on soil nitrogen transformation, microbial purposeful genes, enzyme exercise, and plant nitrogen uptake: a meta-analysis of area research. GCB Bioenergy. 13, 1859–1873. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12898 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ding, J. & Yu, S. Impression of biochar on nitrogen-cycling purposeful genes: a comparative examine in mollisol and alkaline soils. Life 14, 1631. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121631 (2024).
Google Scholar
Khan, Z. et al. How biochar impacts nitrogen assimilation and dynamics by interacting soil and plant enzymatic actions: quantitative evaluation of two years potted examine in a rapeseed-soil system. Entrance. Plant. Sci. 13, 853449. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.853449 (2022).
Google Scholar
Glick, B. R. Micro organism with ACC deaminase can promote plant development and assist to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 169, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ali, D. F. I., El-Nahrawy, S., EL-Zawawy, H. A. H. & Omara, A. E.-D. Efficient purposes of Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens as biocontrol brokers of damping-off illness and biostimulation of tomato crops. Stresses 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses5010009 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hammerschmiedt, T. et al. Assessing the potential of biochar aged by humic substances to reinforce plant development and soil organic exercise. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 8, 46 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00242-7 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zou, Q. et al. The synergistic interplay impact between biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on useful microbial communities in soil. Entrance. Plant. Sci. 15, 1501400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1501400 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sarfraz, R. et al. Position of biochar and plant development selling rhizobacteria to reinforce soil carbon sequestration—a evaluation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191, 251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7400-9 (2019).
Google Scholar
Neshat, M. et al. Plant development selling micro organism (PGPR) induce antioxidant tolerance in opposition to salinity stress by means of biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Crops. 28, 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01128-0 (2022).
Google Scholar
Joseph, S. et al. How biochar works, and when it doesn’t: a evaluation of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy. 13, 1731–1764. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12885 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zulfiqar, S., Sharif, S., Saeed, M. & Tahir, A. Position of carotenoids in photosynthesis. in Carotenoids: Construction and Operate within the Human Physique (eds. Zia-Ul-Haq, M., Dewanjee, S. & Riaz, M.) 147–187 (Springer Worldwide Publishing, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46459-2_5
Hasanuzzaman, M. et al. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant protection in crops below abiotic stress: revisiting the essential position of a common protection regulator. Antioxidants 9, 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mantelin, S. & Touraine, B. Plant growth-promoting micro organism and nitrate availability: impacts on root improvement and nitrate uptake. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh010 (2003).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. Impact of humic acid addition on buffering capability and nutrient storage capability of soilless substrates. Entrance. Plant. Sci. 12, 644229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.644229 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bouremani, N. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a rampart in opposition to the hostile results of drought stress. Water 15, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030418 (2023).
Google Scholar
Salehi, A., Yaghoubian, I. & Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M. Biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve physio-biochemical traits, secondary metabolites, oil, and grain yield of rapeseed below salinity stress. Plant. Progress Regul. 105, 2297–2315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-025-01393-5 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pei, J. et al. 5 years of biochar modification mixed with decreased fertilization and irrigation improved the soil natural carbon composition and construction in a solonchak. Sci. Rep. 15, 21823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06859-0 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. et al. Value-benefit evaluation of utilizing biochar to enhance cereals agriculture. GCB Bioenergy. 7, 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12180 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jokubė, M., Hyyrynen, M., Pihlainen, S. & Hyytiäinen, Ok. Financial feasibility of biochar for carbon inventory enhancement in Finnish agricultural soils. Carbon Manag. 16, 2465328. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2465328 (2025).
Google Scholar
Campion, L., Bekchanova, M., Malina, R. & Kuppens, T. The prices and advantages of biochar manufacturing and use: A scientific evaluation. J. Clear. Prod. 408, 137138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137138 (2023).
Google Scholar
