Mellor, P. S., Boorman, J. & Baylis, M. Culicoides biting midges: their function as arbovirus vectors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 307–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.307 (2000).
Google Scholar
Maclachlan, N. J. Bluetongue: historical past, international epidemiology, and pathogenesis. Prev. Vet. Med. 102, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.005 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rushton, J. & Lyons, N. Financial affect of Bluetongue: a evaluate of the consequences on manufacturing. Vet. Ital. 51, 401–406. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.646.3183.1 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gethmann, J., Probst, C. & Conraths, F. J. Financial Influence of a Bluetongue Serotype 8 Epidemic in Germany. Entrance. Vet. Sci. 7, 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00065 (2020).
Google Scholar
Holbrook, F. R. et al. Sympatry within the Culicoides variipennis complicated (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae): a taxonomic reassessment. J. Med. Entomol. 37, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.65 (2000).
Google Scholar
Maclachlan, N. J., Zientara, S., Savini, G. & Daniels, P. W. Epizootic haemorrhagic illness. Rev. Sci. Tech. 34, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.34.2.2361 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nayduch, D. et al. Finding out Culicoides vectors of BTV within the post-genomic period: sources, bottlenecks to progress and future instructions. Virus Res. 182, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2013.12.009 (2014).
Google Scholar
Morales-Hojas, R. et al. The genome of the biting midge Culicoides sonorensis and gene expression analyses of vector competence for bluetongue virus. BMC Genom. 19, 624. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5014-1 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gantz, V. M. & Akbari, O. S. Gene modifying applied sciences and purposes for bugs. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 28, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.05.006 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chaverra-Rodríguez, D. et al. Focused supply of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into arthropod ovaries for heritable germline gene modifying (ReMOT Management). Nat. Commun. 9, 3008. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05425-9 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., Piulachs, M. D., Belles, X. & Daimon, T. DIPA-CRISPR is an easy and accessible technique for insect gene modifying. Cell. Rep. Strategies. 2, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100215 (2022).
Google Scholar
De Rouck, S., Mocchetti, A., Dermauw, W. & Van Leeuwen, T. SYNCAS: Environment friendly CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing in tough to rework arthropods. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 165, 104068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2023.104068 (2024).
Google Scholar
Macias, V. M. et al. Cas9-Mediated Gene-Modifying within the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi by ReMOT Management. G3 (Bethesda) 10, 1353–1360, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401133
Li, X. et al. ReMOT Management Supply of CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complicated to Induce Germline Mutagenesis within the Illness Vector Mosquitoes Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 58, 1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. L. et al. Excessive-efficiency gene modifying in Anopheles sinensis utilizing ReMOT management. Insect Sci. 31, 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13306 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sharma, A. et al. Cas9-mediated gene modifying within the black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, by embryo injection and ReMOT Management. iScience 25, 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103781 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yu, B. et al. Cas9-Mediated Gene Modifying Utilizing Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT) Management in Bombyx mori. Bugs 14, 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14120932 (2023).
Google Scholar
Heu, C. C., McCullough, F. M., Luan, J. & Rasgon, J. L. CRISPR-Cas9-Primarily based Genome Modifying within the Silverleaf Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). CRISPR J. 3, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2019.0067 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chaverra-Rodríguez, D., Bui, M., Gilleland, C. L., Rasgon, J. L. & Akbari, O. S. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. GEN. Biotechnol. 2, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1089/genbio.2023.0022 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chaverra-Rodríguez, D. et al. Germline mutagenesis of Nasonia vitripennis by ovarian supply of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein. Insect Mol. Biol. 29, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12663 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shigenobu, S., Yoda, S., Ohsawa, S. & Suzuki, M. Refined, CRISPR /Cas9 genome modifying within the pea aphid uncovers the important roles of Laccase2 in overwintering egg adaptation. PLoS Genet. 21, e1011557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011557 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mocchetti, A., De Rouck, S., Naessens, S., Dermauw, W. & Van Leeuwan, T. SYNCAS primarily based CRISPR-Cas9 gene modifying in predatory mites, whiteflies and stinkbugs. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 177, 104232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2024.104232 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lima, L. et al. Gene Modifying within the Chagas Illness Vector Rhodnius prolixus by Cas9-Mediated ReMOT Management. CRISPR J. 7, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2023.0076 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dermauw, W. et al. Focused mutagenesis utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 within the chelicerate herbivore Tetranychus urticae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 120, 103347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103347 (2020).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, N., Hinomoto, N. & Daimon, T. Comparability of DIPA-CRISPR and SYNCAS gene modifying strategies within the predatory bug Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 60, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-025-00923-x (2025).
Google Scholar
Terradas, G. et al. The Improvement and Enlargement of in vivo Germline Modifying Applied sciences in Arthropods: Receptor-Mediated Ovary Transduction of Cargo (ReMOT Management) and Past. Integr. Comp. Biol. 63, 1550–1563. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad123 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, G. H. et al. Combating mosquito-borne illnesses utilizing genetic management applied sciences. Nat. Commun. 12, 4388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24654-z (2021).
Google Scholar
Boorman, J. The upkeep of laboratory colonies of Culicoides variipennis, C. nubeculosus and C. riethi. Bull. Entomol. Res. 64, 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300031254 (1974).
Google Scholar
Bassett, A. R., Tibbit, C., Ponting, C. P. & Liu, J. L. Extremely environment friendly focused mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell. Rep. 4, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.020 (2013).
Google Scholar
Meccariello, A. et al. Extremely environment friendly DNA-free gene disruption within the agricultural pest Ceratitis capitata by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Sci. Rep. 7, 10061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10347-5 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bai, X. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the attention pigmentation gene white results in alterations in color of head spots within the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Insect Mol. Biol. 28, 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12592 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, S. et al. Environment friendly somatic and germline genome engineering of Bactrocera dorsalis by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Pest Manag Sci. 75, 1921–1932. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5305 (2019).
Google Scholar
Paulo, D. F. et al. A Unified Protocol for CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockout in Tephritid Fruit Flies Led to the Recreation of White Eye and White Puparium Phenotypes within the Melon Fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 115, 2110–2115. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac166 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fu, L. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Knockout of the White Gene in Agasicles hygrophila. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104586 (2025).
Google Scholar
Labun, Okay. et al. CHOPCHOP v3: Increasing the CRISPR net toolbox past genome modifying. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (W171–W174). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz365 (2019).
Conant, D. et al. Inference of CRISPR edits from Sanger hint knowledge. CRISPR J. 5, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2021.0113 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, M. Q. et al. Environment friendly DIPA-CRISPR-mediated knockout of an eye fixed pigment gene within the white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera. Insect Sci. 31, 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13286 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferrandez-Roldan, A. & Piulachs, M. D. Utilizing DIPA-CRISPR for easy and environment friendly endogenous protein tagging in bugs. Cell. Rep. Strategies. 6, 101297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101297 (2026).
Google Scholar
Rees, D. C., Johnson, E. & Lewinson, O. ABC transporters: The ability to vary. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2646 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ewart, G. D. & Howells, A. J. ABC transporters concerned in transport of eye pigment precursors in Drosophila melanogaster. Strategies Enzymol. 292, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(98)92017-1 (1998).
Google Scholar
Mackenzie, S. M., Howells, A. J., Cox, G. B. & Ewart, G. D. Subcellular localisation of the White/Scarlet ABC Transporter to Pigment Granule Membranes Throughout the Compound Eye of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetica 108, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004115718597 (2000).
Google Scholar
Zoghbi, M. E. & Altenberg, G. A. ATP binding to 2 websites is important for dimerization of nucleotide-binding domains of ABC proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 443, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.050 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mackenzie, S. M. et al. Mutations within the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster affecting ABC transporters that decide eye colouration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1419, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00064-4 (1999).
Google Scholar
Ewart, G. D., Cannell, D., Cox, G. B. & Howells, A. J. Mutational evaluation of the site visitors ATPase (ABC) transporters concerned in uptake of eye pigment precursors in Drosophila melanogaster. Implications for structure-function relationships. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10370–10377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)34070-X (1994).
Google Scholar
Kane, N. S., Vora, M., Varre, Okay. J. & Padgett, R. W. Environment friendly Screening of CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Occasions in Drosophila Utilizing a Co-CRISPR Technique. G3 (Bethesda). 7, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.036723 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhu, G. H., Albishi, N. M., Chen, X., Brown, R. L. & Palli, S. R. Increasing the Toolkit for Genome Modifying in Aedes aegypti. CRISPR J. 4, 846-853. 10.1089/crispr.2020.0052 (2021).
Han, W. Okay. et al. Co-CRISPR: A precious toolkit for mutation enrichment within the gene modifying of Spodoptera frugiperda. Insect Sci. 30, 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13122 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bittrich, S., Segura, J., Duarte, J. M., Burley, S. Okay. & Rose, Y. RCSB protein Knowledge Financial institution: exploring protein 3D similarities by way of complete structural alignments. Bioinformatics 40, btae370. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae370 (2024).
Google Scholar
![[2606.11056] On pseudogap section as precursor to a superconducting dome in high-Tc cuprates: Non-analytic T* as a perform of doping](http://arxiv.org/static/browse/0.3.4/images/arxiv-logo-fb.png "[2606.11056] On pseudogap section as precursor to a superconducting dome in high-Tc cuprates: Non-analytic T* as a perform of doping"){kind=logo}
